Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(131,088 posts)
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 05:29 PM Nov 10

Comment: If justices limit Trump's power, it starts with tariffs

By Noah Feldman / Bloomberg Opinion

Until now, the U.S. Supreme Court has been modestly deferential to Donald Trump’s executive overreach. Oral arguments in the case challenging the legality of the president’s tariffs suggest that this may be about to change.

The court’s three liberal justices appear sure to vote that Trump lacked the authority to impose the tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Amy Coney Barrett all sounded as though they were contemplating joining their liberal colleagues; each for reasons rooted in their individual versions of conservative jurisprudence. If at least two of the three decided to join, as now seems possible, Trump will have to try and reimpose the tariffs based on a patchwork of other legal authorities, which might significantly constrain his ability to do so effectively.

The technical question before the court is whether the words “regulate … importation” in the IEEPA empower Trump to adopt essentially any tariffs he chooses once he has determined that an emergency exists under the statute. His best argument is that imposing tariffs is a means of regulating importation. A textualist reading of the statute would, under that interpretation, appear to support Trump’s power. What’s more, as Justice Brett Kavanaugh emphasized during oral arguments, former President Richard Nixon adopted a tariff under the authority of a predecessor statute to the IEEPA. That tariff was upheld by an appeals court; a fact that Congress knew when it enacted the IEEPA.

The arguments against Trump’s tariff power are varied; and as it happens, each of the conservatives who might vote against him has a different theory of why his actions are problematic. Roberts’s pet theory is the Major Questions Doctrine, known to Supreme Court nerds as MQD.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/comment-if-justices-limit-trumps-power-it-starts-with-tariffs/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Comment: If justices limit Trump's power, it starts with tariffs (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 10 OP
They would take away his only tool for international diplomacy. Turbineguy Nov 10 #1

Turbineguy

(39,643 posts)
1. They would take away his only tool for international diplomacy.
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 05:42 PM
Nov 10

That's why we elect smarter guys than him to do the job.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Comment: If justices limi...