Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Passages

(3,893 posts)
Fri Nov 21, 2025, 08:01 PM Friday

As the Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Trump's "Emergency" Tariffs, Few Good Outcomes Await

October 30, 2025

By Todd N. Tucker

On Wednesday, November 5, the Supreme Court will hear extended arguments about the legality of the Trump administration’s tariffs under the International Emergencies Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. Brought by a suite of importers represented by libertarian law firms and blue state attorneys general, the legal battle could culminate in a wide range of outcomes as outlined in this brief. The complexity of these challenges illustrates an example of a much broader problem in trade policy and beyond: A functioning and effective government requires all three branches to check each other. Congress cannot shirk its constitutional duties and leave them to the courts.

The Supreme Court consolidated three of the eight challenges Trump’s tariffs have faced in federal court: V.O.S. Selections Inc. v. Trump, Oregon v. US Department of Homeland Security, and Learning Resources v. Trump. The first two had been jointly ruled on by the Court of International Trade (CIT) in May, which found unanimously against the government. This ruling was appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, where an 11-judge panel ruled the following:

Four judges (appointed by George H.W. Bush, Barack Obama, and two by Joe Biden) said the IEEPA doesn’t allow tariffs.
Four judges (two appointed by George W. Bush II and Obama each, and including the current and former chief judges) said the IEEPA does allow tariffs.
Three judges (one appointed by Clinton and two by Obama) said the IEEPA doesn’t allow these tariffs.
This latter bloc constituted the majority ruling. The Learning Resources case was ruled on separately in the US District Court for the District of Columbia in May by the Obama-appointed Judge Rudolph Contreras, who found that IEEPA doesn’t allow tariffs.


https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/supreme-court-trumps-emergency-tariffs/




Dentons
Trump administration removes certain agricultural tariffs as US Supreme Court prepares to rule on broad “reciprocal tariffs”
On Friday, November 14, 2025, the Trump administration removed tariffs on over 200 agricultural products that it determined to be “not grown...
.
2 days ago
https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/newsletters/2025/november/19/trump-2-0-navigating-change-in-canada/trump-administration-removes-certain-agricultural-tariffs

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»As the Supreme Court Hear...