Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Passages

(3,893 posts)
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 08:21 AM Yesterday

At 250, Too Sacred Not to Be Touched

By Jeanne Zaino


“We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilised society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.” - Thomas Jefferson, 1816

On November 4, the government shutdown became the longest in American history. This, coupled with mounting public frustration over the state of American politics, has prompted many people to ask what can be done to reform the system?

It is the right question, but even the mere suggestion is met with charges of disloyalty and a lack of proper fealty to the Framers.

This is unfortunate because, as the quote by Jefferson demonstrates, nothing could be further from the truth.

It is patriotic to revisit, reconsider, and revise the work of the Founders. Anyone who suggests otherwise or treats the Constitution as “too sacred to be touched,” needs to go back and read the Framers, all of whom agreed that: (a) the original Constitution was imperfect but should be ratified anyway, and (b) constitutions should not be changed for ‘light and transient causes,’ but if, after careful consideration, future generations find reform is necessary, it should be undertaken following proper procedures.

https://www.thepresidency.org/the-dispatch/the-cspc-dispatch-nov-14-2025

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At 250, Too Sacred Not to Be Touched (Original Post) Passages Yesterday OP
The problem isn't that the framers didn't put restraints on a President. They were of high ideals and they couldn't ... marble falls Yesterday #1

marble falls

(69,572 posts)
1. The problem isn't that the framers didn't put restraints on a President. They were of high ideals and they couldn't ...
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 08:27 AM
Yesterday

... imagine a President without self restraint.

We need to elect a Congress that will set the limits TACO has demonstrated are needed. And add an amendment for it.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»At 250, Too Sacred Not to...