Strike against Iran seems like 2003; in some ways, worse
By Andreas Kluth / Bloomberg Opinion Less than a year ago, President Donald Trump gave a speech in the Middle East in which he excoriated his predecessors for their habit of launching “forever wars” in that region. Alluding to the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 in particular, he accused them of “intervening in complex societies that they did not even understand themselves,” with the result that they “wrecked far more nations than they built.”
And here is Trump now, intervening in a complex society that he does not understand: “The hour of your freedom is at hand,” he told the Iranian people in announcing the start of what appears to be a massive, indeed maximalist, U.S.-Israeli campaign against the regime in Tehran. The Iranians are already returning fire, shooting at targets linked to America across the Gulf region.
This is not a surgical and limited strike like Operation Midnight Hammer in June. This is war with both barrels, unpredictable and possibly uncontrollable. “The lives of courageous American heroes may be lost and we may have casualties; that often happens in war,” Trump conceded in announcing the attack. Has he just launched the latest American forever war, the exact kind that he promised his own MAGA base to end and avoid?
The differences and similarities between 2026 and 2003 are eerie. Then as now, American intervention was ostensibly, but not really, about weapons of mass destruction; Iraq turned out not to have them, and Iran doesn’t have them now. (The U.S. says it “obliterated” its nuclear facilities, although it’s unclear whether the regime could rebuild the covert program.)
https://www.heraldnet.com/2026/03/03/comment-strike-against-iran-seems-like-2003-in-some-ways-worse/
= new reply since forum marked as read
