TV Chat
Related: About this forum'Star Trek: Discovery' Season 3: What We Know and What We Hope For
Star Trek: Discovery" Season 2 spoilers ahead..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The third season will be set 950 years in the future

The Season 2 finale of "Star Trek: Discovery" left us scratching our heads somewhat after a one-way trip through a time wormhole to place a dangerous collection of data out of harm's way, the USS Discovery now appears to be trapped 950 years in the future t.
In the final moments of that episode, "Discovery" stopped being a prequel to "The Original Series" and instead became the farthest future-flung series in the history of the franchise chronology, rocketing past the events of "The Next Generation," "Deep Space Nine" and "Voyager," all of which take place in the 24th century and arriving at the end of the 32nd century, in the year 3187.
Compare that to the few decades' difference between "The Next Generation" and the new Jean-Luc Picard series, or the single century between "Enterprise" and "The Original Series." Now we potentially have a new, 14- or 15-episode story arc set nearly a millennium after the events of "Deep Space Nine" and "Voyager."
This certainly raises a few questions and offers some interesting potential routes for the series to travel next.
Contd https://www.space.com/amp/star-trek-discovery-season-3-possibilities.html
exboyfil
(18,315 posts)Warp has been lost (it was a story line at one point that warp actually degraded space). Discovery is the only warp capable spaceship around (or one of very few).
rogue emissary
(3,334 posts)FreepFryer
(7,086 posts)The writing of Discovery is atrocious. To have been so poor at writing Star Trek that, having demolished the setting and ham-handedly attempted to fix canon (their solution: its classified?!!?) now they are doing what they should have done from the outset: set the series in a future where the CGI might actually fit (their look was WAY off to make any sense as a prequel), and they can write screenplays that dont demand expertise the way Star Trek does.
Pike was well-played, and the highlight of what otherwise is a gigantic, tragic and unprecedentedly expensive piece of shit.
Just my $.02.
exboyfil
(18,315 posts)You are right about the rest.
FreepFryer
(7,086 posts)...exploring Pikes future and his acceptance and understanding of the tragedy to come was probably the most human and compelling plot point in the entire series. That it was a resolution of a tension point set up in the original TOS pilot only pointed more to the STD writers inability to conceive of and carry an entire plot arc. If they had had to write his accident from scratch, theyd have botched it imho.
Quemado
(1,262 posts)The different timeline and the canon violations.
Star Trek is a fandom in which canon is firmly established. Most Star Trek fans expect canon to be adhered to.
Star Trek since 2009, IMO, has gone down in quality big time.
BTW, I've been a Star Trek fan since 1965. I've seen every TV episode and movie.
FreepFryer
(7,086 posts)Thus, not true Star Trek. Roddenberrys vision on this question was unambiguous, if com0licating from a drama perspective. While TOS had horror aspects (the monsters etc), the sheer number of people sucked screaming out into the void of space tells me that these reboot universes are not the product of happy or optimistic writers.
LessAspin
(1,743 posts)eShirl
(19,946 posts)Now I'm about to watch part one of the mid-season two-parter. By myself. And I'm psyched!
LessAspin
(1,743 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 11, 2021, 06:35 PM - Edit history (4)
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
LessAspin
(1,743 posts)LessAspin
(1,743 posts)Who says no?
Could we see Captain Michael Burnham again in Star Trek: Starfleet Academy? It certainly sounds possible.
By Lacy Baugher
November 13, 2025

Photo: Michael Gibson | Paramount+
One of the best things about the larger Star Trek universe is how interconnected its worlds can be. Easter eggs abound. Plot threads can cross series. The actions of characters from centuries prior can often continue to shape those who come after them. And sometimes it gives fans a chance to see familiar faces from a previous property pop up somewhere new. Its part of the joy inherent in this worldwe never really say goodbye to any part of it.
Still, the choice to set Star Trek: Starfleet Academy immediately following the events of Star Trek: Discovery is, admittedly, a somewhat controversial one. The shows later seasons took place in the 32nd century in the wake of an event known as The Burn, which fractured the Federation and essentially ended Starfleet Academy as it had been known up until that point. The new series will chart its rebirth, following the first class of cadets to come through the institution in over a century and all their subsequent personal, professional, and academic dramas.
But its position in the timeline means that its a series thats ripe for potential crossovers in a way that the bulk of its predecessors were not. (That wonderfully weird Star Trek: Strange Worlds meets Star Trek: Lower Decks episode aside.) After all, the Discovery crew is still living and working for the Federation during this time period and some are already slated to appear on the show! Tig Notaro and Oded Fehr are already both set to return as Jett Reno and Admiral Charles Vance, and Mary Wisemans Lt. Sylvia Tilly will also appear in an episode of the series first season. (Which makes sense, given that she herself is now an Academy instructor.) But what about everybody else?
TrekMovie.com reports that it seems as though the door is open when it comes to Burnhams potential involvement. In the most recent issue of former TVLine reporter Matt Mitovitchs subscriber-only Inside Line column, a commenter wondered about the likelihood of the actress somehow finding her way to the world of Starfleet Academy.
"When I brought your Q to Martin-Green after the recent Boston Blue event, the way she giddily lit up made clear that she is well-versed on the overlapping timelines, Mitovitch reported. Let me tell you somethingit would be so much fun. Ill put it like that, the Discovery alum answered. And I will also say that [co-showrunner] Alex Kurtzman did it on purpose. He put SFA in the same timeline so that there would be the potential for crossovers. Theres a lot of opportunity there, and thats exciting. ...
https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/sonequa-martin-green-door-open-starfleet-academy-discovery-crossover/
|
