Judge rejects DOJ's post-sentencing dismissal request in police civil rights case
Calling the U.S. Department of Justices request contrary to the public interest, a judge has declined to dismiss a criminal case against a former Los Angeles County sheriffs deputy already convicted and sentenced to prison for violating a womans civil rights through excessive force.
Prosecutors want the indictment dismissed not because they reconsidered it or found new evidence, but because of disagreement with the Courts decision to sentence Defendant to four months in prison, U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson said in an 11-page order signed Friday and filed Monday.
Wilson called the dismissal motion a direct attempt to override the Courts decision to sentence Defendant to four months in prison.
Using Rule 48(a) in this way is contrary to the public interest, the judge wrote, referring to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure governing dismissal motions.
Put simply, the Government disagrees with the Courts sentencing decision and is using Rule 48(a) to erase it. It has even acknowledged that this is its reason for seeking dismissal, he continued.
Wilson quoted Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Keenans argument that the public interest is what the government says is the public interest in this courtroom.
The Government is wrongat this stage, it does not have unbounded discretion to dismiss cases. The history of Rule 48(a) makes that clear, Wilson said.
Kirk is to surrender to the Federal Bureau of Prisons on Aug. 28 to begin his sentence.
https://www.legalaffairsandtrials.com/p/judge-rejects-dojs-post-sentencing