Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Elizabeth Warren
Related: About this forumWhy do they keep including Warren in presidential polls when she says she's not running, but
people like Donald Trump say they want to run, but don't get included in many polls?
Theres something odd about the early polls on the 2016 presidential primaries.
No, its not just that the first primary is still over eight months away. Its the people the polls are testing as candidates. Recent trial heat questions exclude some who say they are running but include others who insist theyre not.
Businessman Donald Trump says he will run but as of this writing appears in only three of seven New Hampshire Republican primary polls since the beginning of 2015. Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren has repeatedly denied shes running but appears in five of six New Hampshire Democratic primary polls since January. Nationally, Warren has been included in 13 of 18 and Trump is in two of 15 surveys this year.
Why ask about Warren but not Trump?
...Smith noted that the criteria as to who to include and who not to include gets kind of fuzzy.
Opinions about polling on Warren, the avowed non-candidate, are mixed. Some pollsters think her comments should be taken at face value. Carvalho cited her repeated denials and said, Until she indicates otherwise, she will not be included.
Others ask about Warren simply because of the so-far-anemic Democratic presidential field. As Tom Jensen, director of Public Policy Polling, said, Ive given a lot of thought to whether we should continue keeping Biden and Warren in there and for now have erred on the side of leaving them due to the lack of other prominent Democratic candidates. Besides former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, of course.
Smith has a different view on why to include Warren: The fact that there is a fairly significant draft Elizabeth Warren campaign in New Hampshire thats being run by seasoned New Hampshire political pros is a strong indication to me that Elizabeth Warren hasnt really put her foot down and told them in no uncertain terms that shes not running. I think that door is open a little bit further than Warren is indicating right now.
Opinion regarding Donald Trump is more definitive: Pollsters' best guess is that he's not really going to run....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/08/warren-trump-2016-polls_n_7026470.html
No, its not just that the first primary is still over eight months away. Its the people the polls are testing as candidates. Recent trial heat questions exclude some who say they are running but include others who insist theyre not.
Businessman Donald Trump says he will run but as of this writing appears in only three of seven New Hampshire Republican primary polls since the beginning of 2015. Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren has repeatedly denied shes running but appears in five of six New Hampshire Democratic primary polls since January. Nationally, Warren has been included in 13 of 18 and Trump is in two of 15 surveys this year.
Why ask about Warren but not Trump?
...Smith noted that the criteria as to who to include and who not to include gets kind of fuzzy.
Opinions about polling on Warren, the avowed non-candidate, are mixed. Some pollsters think her comments should be taken at face value. Carvalho cited her repeated denials and said, Until she indicates otherwise, she will not be included.
Others ask about Warren simply because of the so-far-anemic Democratic presidential field. As Tom Jensen, director of Public Policy Polling, said, Ive given a lot of thought to whether we should continue keeping Biden and Warren in there and for now have erred on the side of leaving them due to the lack of other prominent Democratic candidates. Besides former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, of course.
Smith has a different view on why to include Warren: The fact that there is a fairly significant draft Elizabeth Warren campaign in New Hampshire thats being run by seasoned New Hampshire political pros is a strong indication to me that Elizabeth Warren hasnt really put her foot down and told them in no uncertain terms that shes not running. I think that door is open a little bit further than Warren is indicating right now.
Opinion regarding Donald Trump is more definitive: Pollsters' best guess is that he's not really going to run....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/08/warren-trump-2016-polls_n_7026470.html
					
						4 replies
						
							 = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
  = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
				
				 = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
  = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
				
						Why do they keep including Warren in presidential polls when she says she's not running, but (Original Post)
						RiverLover
						Apr 2015
						OP
					
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
        
        Yes, just the threat of Elizabeth running might help in that department. We'll see.
        InAbLuEsTaTe
        Apr 2015
        #4
      
      
Demeter
(85,373 posts)1. Perhaps it's the pollsters way of saying:
        everybody wants you to run, Senator Warren. You would even win. Just say the word!
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)2. I like ^this best!!!
        Thanks for the smile Demeter.   
 
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)3. Given that the media is totally obsessed with the "horse race" aspect
        of presidential elections it is understandable. The way I see it is that, even though Warren is not running, it keeps her--and her progressive positions--squarely in the picture and makes it more difficult for triangulators (ahem) to pull to the right. Which, imho, is all good.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,444 posts)4. Yes, just the threat of Elizabeth running might help in that department. We'll see.
        
