Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Do not
believe
everything
you see on
the Internet
- Abraham
Lincoln


RUN
FOR
SOMETHING

A government
of laws, and
not of men.
—John Adams


FIGHT
FOR
DEMOCRACY



This is the
flower of
the partisan
Who died
for freedom

We Will
Drive MAGA
Back Under
Their Rocks


Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!

Eugene

(66,201 posts)
Thu Sep 19, 2024, 11:34 PM Sep 2024

Illinois' top court says odor of burnt marijuana isn't enough to search car

Source: Associated Press

Illinois’ top court says odor of burnt marijuana isn’t enough to search car

Updated 4:28 PM EDT, September 19, 2024

CAMBRIDGE, Ill. (AP) — An odor of burnt marijuana doesn’t justify a search of a car without a warrant in Illinois, the state Supreme Court said Thursday.

The court affirmed lower court rulings that threw out evidence of a small amount of marijuana discovered during a traffic stop in Henry County in 2020.

It is illegal to drive and smoke marijuana. But lawyers for the driver argued that the smell of burnt marijuana is not enough to believe a crime has occurred, especially after Illinois legalized the possession of marijuana in 2019.

The driver denied smoking in the vehicle.

“There are now a myriad of situations where cannabis can be used and possessed, and the smell resulting from that legal use and possession is not indicative of the commission of a criminal offense,” Justice P. Scott Neville Jr. said in the 6-0 opinion.

-snip-

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/illinois-supreme-court-marijuana-odor-car-search-26fc42a3a7470c9e4032efaee2230b8e

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cannabis»Illinois' top court says ...