Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)

7. The information was not false, it was complete to what you asked, but incomplete to what you wanted

Reply to LAS14 (Reply #6)

Sun Jun 1, 2025, 03:14 PM

Jun 2025

If you want to read about sexual relations, you need to ask about sexual relations. The AI can't read your mind about your thirst for that topic.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MineralMan

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Examples of AS (Artificial Stupidity) [View all] LAS14 Jun 2025 OP

Will I be able to recognize most AI crap? vapor2 Jun 2025 #1

"We already own the rights to 'Natural Stupidity.' So don't get any ideas." - magatland repubes BoRaGard Jun 2025 #2

Where's the "hallucination"? That is the etymology of the word. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2025 #3

Your understanding of "enclose" is quite different from mine. LAS14 Jun 2025 #4

It doesn't "enclose" any organs. Crunchy Frog Jun 2025 #8

👀 Nimble_Idea Jun 2025 #9

Car doors open, but are closed 99% of the time, enclosing the passengers/contents. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2025 #10

A vagina is a tube. A car door isn't. Crunchy Frog Jun 2025 #11

We are talking function, not form. Poor analogy to distract with form. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2025 #12

Unfortunately, you picked a poor example. MineralMan Jun 2025 #5

OK, so the false info that AI supplied was irrelevant to the query. LAS14 Jun 2025 #6

The information was not false, it was complete to what you asked, but incomplete to what you wanted Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2025 #7

I can't believe this thread has gone in this direction. nt LAS14 Jun 2025 #13

It started with a faulty premise TheProle Jun 2025 #14

How could you make "What is the etymology of the word 'vagina'" more clear? nt LAS14 Jun 2025 #16

Many humans would have provided MineralMan Jun 2025 #15

Like I said, a weird path for this thread, but, to answer your post... LAS14 Jun 2025 #17

But, it does that, too. MineralMan Jun 2025 #18

Oh, for crying out loud. It provides access, not blockage. It certainly doesn't "enclose." nt LAS14 Jun 2025 #19

I'm done here. MineralMan Jun 2025 #20

The labia BeerBarrelPolka Jun 2025 #21

False dichotomy. Access does not prohibit enclosure occurring. Enclosure does not deny access forever Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2025 #22

You can't actually "close" your vagina Crunchy Frog Jun 2025 #24

Again with the all-or-nothing thinking. There are degees of closure. A locked car door can be opened w a crowbar Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2025 #25

I don't actually have the capacity to "close" my vagina Crunchy Frog Jun 2025 #26

Again, closing does not mean sealing or require sealing or locking. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2025 #27

The anus actually has a sphincter muscle Crunchy Frog Jun 2025 #28

The anus is voluntary and involuntary, like breathing is voluntary and involuntary. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2025 #29

You wrote this: BeerBarrelPolka Jun 2025 #32

It should have gone in a worse direction. Igel Jun 2025 #23

I'm getting the feeling Retrograde Jun 2025 #30

Another example: Google AI claiming that a white man is actually black. W_HAMILTON Jun 2025 #31