Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lurker Deluxe

(1,070 posts)
29. Well ....
Tue Jun 3, 2025, 06:11 PM
Jun 3

I am sitting here at the local watering hole having a couple. When I leave I will tip this lovely young lady $20.

Do I make more than the owner of the watering hole … maybe. I damn sure make more than the hostess.

In the morning I will stop and get a cup of coffee from a mom and pop shop for $5. Do I make more than the owner, most likely.

At the end of the pay period my employer will pay me. They certainly have more money than .

Money moves and it moves in all directions, always has and always will.

The strange part of this interaction is the guy sitting next to me just bought me a shot, because it is Tuesday and his pocket is full. By the end of the week he will ask me to spot him $50, and I will.

The decisions he makes determines his lifestyle and although he walked across the street to get here past my new car he sits here and spends his check on buying drinks for others.

Great guy, will always be broke.

And although his politics are whack, he is very typical of those who cry about “others” taking what is “his”.

Just as those who think the “corporations” are stealing and hoarding.

XOM has never bought me a beer and asked for money to loan 3 days later. They have bought me a drink at the expo downtown.

Different strokes.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Excellent. Midnight Writer Jun 2 #1
Well .... Lurker Deluxe Jun 3 #29
Except the bank doesn't sit on it ("for decades"). Disaffected Jun 2 #2
Like stock buy backs and dividends to stock holders. flashman13 Jun 2 #3
Both of which though keep the funds mobile and Disaffected Jun 2 #5
Stock buybacks inject money into the economy because the stock has to PAID for. Likewise dividends Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2 #14
Stock buy backs waste productivity. They represent a failure to strengthen and build flashman13 Jun 2 #18
Wrong. Stock is just a form of currency: a liquid asset that can be switched to cash and back. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2 #19
No they don't. They are a form of corporate cancer. Enough said. flashman13 Jun 3 #25
You will be unable to explain a coherent true understanding of your bizarre theory. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 3 #27
Ah yes, but cash in action(the flow) is what makes cachukis Jun 3 #31
Exactly. If it can't be put in motion, then plow it back into the company, if you have confidence in the company Bernardo de La Paz Jun 3 #32
High brow. But the abuses seem to abound in cachukis Jun 3 #33
Yes, the disparity in wealth and income btwn the 1% and the 50% is a big unsustainable problem. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 3 #34
So you DO understand the multiplier effect! W_HAMILTON Jun 3 #35
Obviously b) giving to families. They will spend most of it in relatively short order. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 3 #36
Yes -- and that's the point the OP was making. W_HAMILTON Jun 3 #37
I direct you to my first post in this thread, #12. OP has a point but their argument does not make their point. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 3 #38
You get it. So many don't. . . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2 #13
That's also why "Trickle Down" is bullshit JoseBalow Jun 2 #4
Nothing wrong with investing. The bullshit in "Trickle Down" is parking bucks in real estate and artwork. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2 #15
My first thought was "What was the speaker?" CaptainTruth Jun 2 #6
I understand. I wondered something similar... "Who was the speaker?" littlemissmartypants Jun 2 #9
In another time: Codifer Jun 2 #7
Money in motion. You get it. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2 #16
Except someone is a thief. nt. druidity33 Jun 3 #21
Excellent point and on top of that, they don't employ anyone, at least not in the numbers companies did 50 years ago n/t Cheezoholic Jun 2 #8
But... littlemissmartypants Jun 2 #10
Who exactly is the "they" in PoindexterOglethorpe Jun 3 #26
Nice to know Lurker Deluxe Jun 3 #30
2025 XOM Capex GladysKravitz Jun 2 #11
Welcome to DU. Good first post. You get it. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2 #17
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Jun 3 #23
There is a point but the example is Bogus and Untrue and Ignorant of basic economics Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2 #12
Another plus is Codifer Jun 2 #20
Yes - the Velocity of Money Ruby the Liberal Jun 3 #22
They're Parking Money In A Bank? ProfessorGAC Jun 3 #24
"The restaurant owner gives it to the waitress," greyl Jun 3 #28
If Exxon "Mobile" made profits by way of savings accounts Dreamer Tatum Jun 6 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Threads: Guy pays me $50...»Reply #29