Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Tarzanrock

(1,250 posts)

2. It's rather interesting that they are bringing the action in the San Francisco District

Reply to ancianita (Original post)

Mon Jun 9, 2025, 09:21 PM

Jun 9

of the U.S. District Court for Northern California. I wonder if it will get transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Read Governor Newsom's Lawsuit Challenging Trump's Mobilization of the National Guard -- 22 pages [View all] ancianita Jun 9 OP

Get to the greatest page! SheltieLover Jun 9 #1

It's rather interesting that they are bringing the action in the San Francisco District Tarzanrock Jun 9 #2

Good question. I think it's not the location of the mobilization, but the location of the action against the plaintiff ancianita Jun 9 #3

The USDC for the Central District of California in Los Angeles seems to be the proper venue. Tarzanrock Jun 9 #6

Okay, then. I'll take your word for it. But the motion might be denied and support the AG's decision. We'll see. ancianita Jun 9 #7

Note paragraph 24 of the operative Complaint Tarzanrock Jun 9 #4

I hear you. And it's terrible. But this is about the governor's constitutional due process rights. ancianita Jun 9 #5

The Prayer for Relief is interesting. Tarzanrock Jun 9 #8

The more appeals, the greater the costs for the loser felon. But the felon doesn't care, he's got billions, right? ancianita Jun 9 #9

Not much to interpret. Ms. Toad Jun 9 #10