Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

senseandsensibility

(23,092 posts)
Tue Jun 10, 2025, 04:27 PM Jun 10

Chris Hayes sums it up [View all]

"There's a real attentional trap that all protest movements face and have faced for a long time. If you pull off protests that are polite and civil, even if large, they will struggle to get coverage. Reporters will dismiss them as not newsworthy. But if a few people start lighting stuff on fire? Then you have news. This creates an *enormous* attentional advantage towards the most violent and chaotic kind of protest."

Yes, absolutely. And the depressing part, to me at least, is I don't think there's much soul searching about this, if any, going on in today's newsrooms. The media will continue to let themselves be used in this way instead of doing the kind of in depth on the scene reporting that is required.

If you are as sick of this as I am, consider watching Lawrence O'Donnell on MSNBC. He does not let maga manipulate his coverage. For instance, last night he did not air on scene from the protests because as he put it (paraphrasing) nothing was happening. And by that, he meant nothing to warrant the overreaction of the administration. Basically, the protests were and are the equivalent of a sports celebration in any major city. Instead, he concentrated on what the administration is trying to distract from.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Hayes sums it up