Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(110,719 posts)
3. She would not have allowed Netanyahu to manipulate her every day since the inauguration...
Sat Jun 21, 2025, 09:05 PM
Jun 21

So, I do not see us getting to this point--at least not in the same way or this quickly. I do believe she would have been successful in bringing the international community together to negotiate an ENFORCEABLE NUCLEAR deal with thorough inspections-albeit it might require more time. I don't negate the difficulties in dealing with its regressive theocratic regime but she would have brought in the best negotiators.

So, no. I don't think she would have bombed Iran because I think it quite possible she would NOT have NEEDED to.

Face it. Bebe has drug Trump into this like he would a bull with a nose ring. ZERO evidence that a developed nuclear bomb was any more imminent than it was a year ago, two years ago, 5 years ago, 10 years ago, 20... So, what next to appease Bebe?

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would Kamala Harris Have ...»Reply #3