Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(32,715 posts)

10. I expect the suitcase device would be a lot easier to move and to use.

Sun Jun 22, 2025, 05:38 PM

Jun 22

I don't know about a complete warhead.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question on the movement of nukes to Iran [View all] ananda Jun 22 OP

I think Medvedev is bloviating. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 22 #1

Probably. Eliot Rosewater Jun 22 #2

I'm pretty sure most of the carriers have nukes on board... Wounded Bear Jun 22 #3

And what about submarines? ananda Jun 22 #6

Even this admin isn't telling anybody where they are... Wounded Bear Jun 22 #7

Can Russian subs carry nuclear capability to Iran? ananda Jun 22 #8

Probably...nt Wounded Bear Jun 22 #13

Is our admin and military capable of stopping them? ananda Jun 22 #5

It depends on the nuclear device. If moniss Jun 22 #9

Depending on the warhead and the missile it would be on moniss Jun 22 #14

Interesting OP, but what logistical benefit would there be anciano Jun 22 #11

By logistics I mean how would they do it? ananda Jun 22 #12

Do you actually think they would announce iemanja Jun 22 #15