Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(51,509 posts)
27. The 1953 Iranian coup d'etat, aka Operation Ajax
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 08:49 PM
Jun 22
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat

The 1953 Iranian coup d'état, known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup d'état ( Persian: کودتای ۲۸ مرداد ), was the overthrow of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh on 19 August 1953. Led by the Iranian army and supported by the United States and the United Kingdom, the coup aimed at strengthening the autocratic rule of the shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. A key motive was to protect British oil interests in Iran after its government refused to concede to western oil demands. It was instigated by the United States (under the name TP-AJAX Project or Operation Ajax) and the United Kingdom (under the name Operation Boot). This began a period of dissolution for Iranian democracy and society.

Mosaddegh had sought to audit the documents of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), a British corporation (now part of BP), to verify that AIOC was paying the contracted royalties to Iran, and to limit the company's control over Iranian oil reserves. Upon the AIOC's refusal to cooperate with the Iranian government, the parliament (Majlis) voted to nationalize Iran's oil industry and to expel foreign corporate representatives from the country. After this vote, Britain instigated a worldwide boycott of Iranian oil to pressure Iran economically. Initially, Britain mobilized its military to seize control of the British-built Abadan oil refinery, then the world's largest, but Prime Minister Clement Attlee (in power until 1951) opted instead to tighten the economic boycott while using Iranian agents to undermine Mosaddegh's government. Judging Mosaddegh to be unamenable and fearing the growing influence of the communist Tudeh, UK prime minister Winston Churchill and the Eisenhower administration decided in early 1953 to overthrow Iran's government. The preceding Truman administration had opposed a coup, fearing the precedent that Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) involvement would set, and the U.S. government had been considering unilateral action (without UK support) to assist the Mosaddegh government as late as 1952. British intelligence officials' conclusions and the UK government's solicitations to the US were instrumental in initiating and planning the coup.

Following the coup, a government under General Fazlollah Zahedi was formed which allowed Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the shah of Iran (Persian for 'king'), to rule more firmly as monarch. He relied heavily on United States support to hold on to power. According to the CIA's declassified documents and records, some of the most feared mobsters in Tehran were hired by the CIA to stage pro-shah riots on 19 August. Other men paid by the CIA were brought into Tehran in buses and trucks and took over the streets of the city. Between 200 and 300 people were killed because of the conflict. Mosaddegh was arrested, tried and convicted of treason by the Shah's military court. On 21 December 1953, he was sentenced to three years in jail, then placed under house arrest for the remainder of his life. Other Mosaddegh supporters were imprisoned, and several received the death penalty. The coup strengthened the Shah's authority, and he continued to rule Iran for the next 26 years as a pro-Western monarch until he was overthrown in the Iranian Revolution in 1979.

In August 2013, the U.S. government formally acknowledged the U.S. role in the coup by releasing a bulk of previously classified government documents that show it was in charge of both the planning and the execution of the coup. According to American journalist Stephen Kinzer, the operation included false flag attacks, paid protesters, provocations, the bribing of Iranian politicians and high-ranking security and army officials, as well as pro-coup propaganda. The CIA is quoted as acknowledging the coup was carried out "under CIA direction" and "as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government". In 2023, the CIA took credit for the coup, contradicting a previous scholarly assessment that the CIA had botched the operation, though other assessments agreed that America and Britain had engineered the coup.

snip

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I didn't think it was possible MorbidButterflyTat Jun 22 #1
Add to this dilemma.... FarPoint Jun 22 #2
Uranium enriched to 60% ForgedCrank Jun 22 #3
Weapons Grade Is 90% Minimum ProfessorGAC Jun 22 #6
The point is ForgedCrank Jun 22 #18
Do You Not Know What "Imminent" Means? ProfessorGAC Jun 22 #22
And I disagree. ForgedCrank Jun 22 #28
We are not the trustworthy, peace loving choie Jun 22 #38
It's in the very title of the article NickB79 Jun 22 #25
they don't need to now SonOfNebanaube Jun 22 #39
But most of the work is getting it to 60%, 60% to 90% goes a lot faster EX500rider Jun 23 #63
I wondered about this dsc Jun 23 #66
This is why I have mixed feelings. EndlessWire Jun 22 #7
Iran's one nuclear reactor for energy uses Uranium 3-5%.... Melon Jun 22 #9
I'm right there ForgedCrank Jun 22 #19
Here's an article that comes to the same conclusion appmanga Jun 22 #30
Such certitude! dpibel Jun 22 #31
I guess ForgedCrank Jun 22 #34
Islamaphobia! dpibel Jun 22 #43
Screech all you want, ForgedCrank Jun 22 #45
LOL dpibel Jun 22 #46
Sorry I ForgedCrank Jun 22 #47
no SonOfNebanaube Jun 22 #40
What was the rush? choie Jun 22 #41
At this point I have EndlessWire Jun 23 #49
For about half a century, all of the world's research reactors ran on highly enriched uranium. NNadir Jun 23 #50
You are not going to convince me EndlessWire Jun 23 #57
You are not going to convince me that enriching uranium is only carried out for warlike purposes. NNadir Jun 23 #58
What did I say? EndlessWire Jun 23 #70
This is nonsense. The Petten reactor which produced all of the world's medical isotopes... NNadir Jun 23 #55
Have the ForgedCrank Jun 23 #64
Don't pretend to understand nuclear technology. You don't.. NNadir Jun 23 #65
Yea, sometimes ForgedCrank Jun 23 #67
Thank you for the frank acknowledgement. NNadir Jun 23 #68
No problem. ForgedCrank Jun 23 #69
My family is not violent. We don't call for killing people out of fear and ignorance, not even beating them up. NNadir Jun 24 #72
Excuse me. EndlessWire Jun 24 #71
I don't know why or IF they are enriching uranium. Neither do the war mongers here. I have historically... NNadir Jun 24 #73
Dubya started a war based on lies and was never held accountable Skittles Jun 22 #4
The Epstein Files! BidenRocks Jun 22 #5
Kick dalton99a Jun 22 #8
That was his own intelligence community assessment surfered Jun 22 #10
Intelligence is not a word one associated with malaise Jun 22 #12
Truly. surfered Jun 22 #15
...and dysenteric whaleshit... lastlib Jun 22 #16
W was Cheney's puppet Skittles Jun 22 #24
So now Russia and China are talking about sending nuclear war heads to Iran. multigraincracker Jun 22 #11
THIS malaise Jun 22 #14
The 1953 Iranian coup d'etat, aka Operation Ajax Celerity Jun 22 #27
Thanks for this article. multigraincracker Jun 22 #33
How dare you choie Jun 22 #42
"It's Only Make Believe" sinkingfeeling Jun 22 #13
Al Jazeera? Mosby Jun 22 #17
Netanyahu on Iran's imminent nuclear threat iemanja Jun 22 #29
It's hard to trust Israeli intelligence when Israel's leadership are all just as corrupt & selfserving as ours SunImp Jun 23 #48
Just mobile anthrax labs? Were any of those ever found? LiberalArkie Jun 22 #20
You may have forgotten those were "unknown knowns"........... AZ8theist Jun 22 #23
Any minute now! Aussie105 Jun 22 #21
Nailed it malaise Jun 22 #26
The IAEA monitored it and documents the 60% Uranium. Plus Iran releases info on it. Melon Jun 23 #51
Do any of you remember the Great Bogeyman of 1964? The Domino theory and the Tonkin Gulf Incident? Ping Tung Jun 22 #32
Recommended. H2O Man Jun 22 #35
AGREED, there was NO "imminent threat"--- Jack Valentino Jun 22 #36
Or offering.... Wonder how big a crypto deposit they made. yourout Jun 23 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author choie Jun 22 #37
He wants that vacation property on the Gaza strip, Gabbard told him the truth spanone Jun 22 #44
Deja vu all over again Lulu KC Jun 23 #52
Snookered again I was. applegrove Jun 23 #54
And whatever threat did exist, now it's worse FullySupportDems Jun 23 #56
I asked for evidence in another thread... -misanthroptimist Jun 23 #59
He did this for diversion. His numbers were tanking. spanone Jun 23 #60
Indeed malaise Jun 23 #61
They also said this: EX500rider Jun 23 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»IAEA - there was no immin...»Reply #27