Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SARose

(1,701 posts)
2. Was it self defence?
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 04:26 PM
Jun 23

Snip

Under the UN Charter, there are two ways in which a state can lawfully use force against another state:

the UN Security Council authorises force in exceptional circumstances to restore or maintain international peace and security under Chapter 7

the right of self defence when a state is attacked by another, as outlined in Article 51.

On the first point, there was no UN Security Council authorisation for either Israel or the US to launch an attack on Iran to maintain international peace and security. The security council has long been concerned about Iran’s nuclear program and adopted a series of resolutions related to it. However, none of those resolutions authorised the use of military force.

With regard to self defence, this right is activated if there is an armed attack against a nation. And there’s no evidence of any recent Iranian attacks on the US.

Snip

More

Congress can also shut off funding of a military action. Don’t think MAGA Mike and Thune are on board.

Also, MTG and several others are saying this is not putting America first. MTG actually said it was a “bait and switch” operation.

Is he now a war criminal on top of everything else?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does the US bombing of Ir...»Reply #2