General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: IAEA - there was no imminent threat [View all]NNadir
(36,259 posts)argued that enrichment can be made - and should be made - irrelevant.
I did so on another website: On Plutonium, Nuclear War, and Nuclear Peace
It isn't irrelevant now, however. There are good reasons to enrich uranium, since current technology to save lives from things like extreme global heating, relies on it.
It is 80 years since the last nuclear war, but only hours since the last fossil fuel war, assuming one isn't going on right now, in which case people are being killed by fossil fuel weapons of mass destruction continuously
I'll be interested in these tortured violent assumptions when people start bombing oil refineries to prevent people from making napalm. Until then, consider me unimpressed.
Nuclear ignorance kills people. The death toll in Iraq alone is enormous from the exact same line of bullshit that's being handed out now. Nuclear weapons have not killed people for well over half a century.
The assumption of moral superiority over the Iranians is absurd, particularly for citizens of a country with thousands of nuclear weapons and an obviously insane fascist leader, who people here are praising for his homicidal tendencies.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):