General Discussion

Efilroft Sul

(4,092 posts)

8. I'll bet this decision doesn't apply to any future ruling made by Judge Michael Kacsmaryk.

Reply to Sympthsical (Reply #4)

Fri Jun 27, 2025, 10:17 AM

Jun 27

Because you can bet special accommodations will be made for that jerk.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

W_HAMILTON raging moderate markodochartaigh crazylikafox mwooldri the nelm

60 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

🚨 By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court rules that universal injunctions likely exceed federal courts' authority [View all] In It to Win It Jun 27 OP

Lord. The bank robbers are managing the banks. /nt bucolic_frolic Jun 27 #1

Before Your Eyes Folks, Mr.Bee Jun 27 #55

Except for when it was the Biden presidency newdeal2 Jun 27 #2

Yep. Biden's SAVE student loan repayment plan was blocked for the entire nation due to an injunction... W_HAMILTON Jun 27 #11

Yep. They picked the absolute worst case to grant trump these powers. Hassin Bin Sober Jun 27 #35

So the constitution and its protection are valid in only some appellate jurisdiction JT45242 Jun 27 #3

We have merely a " concept" of a Constitution now. BattleRow Jun 27 #37

To be clear, they're not ruling on Birthright Citizenship Sympthsical Jun 27 #4

I'll bet this decision doesn't apply to any future ruling made by Judge Michael Kacsmaryk. Efilroft Sul Jun 27 #8

That was my first thought -- he's the fucker from Texas, right? W_HAMILTON Jun 27 #15

Yes, that's the guy. The one who thinks he can dictate women's healthcare nationwide. Efilroft Sul Jun 27 #30

It'll be interesting Sympthsical Jun 27 #18

Thank you for the well-reasoned reply. I greatly appreciate the time you took to look at all the angles. Efilroft Sul Jun 27 #33

Perhaps not, but with the snails pace of the courts, and I suspect while waiting for a birthright citizenship lostincalifornia Jun 27 #14

And that's what's pissed the liberal justices off Sympthsical Jun 27 #20

Not only the "liberal justices" I would venture to say. lostincalifornia Jun 27 #32

Deny and/or delay... BattleRow Jun 27 #38

A Win for the fascists. littlemissmartypants Jun 27 #5

As others have noted, this is NOT a ruling on birthright citizenship. Fiendish Thingy Jun 27 #6

So Trump is free to ignore the Constitution edhopper Jun 27 #16

No, that's not what the ruling says Fiendish Thingy Jun 27 #31

If there are further restrictions edhopper Jun 27 #36

You are, at least technically, mistaken Fiendish Thingy Jun 27 #40

It is a de facto ruling edhopper Jun 27 #42

We shall see. Fiendish Thingy Jun 27 #44

A man born to an American soldier edhopper Jun 27 #45

And the Court's given people 30 days to do exactly that Sympthsical Jun 27 #21

And places with Trumper Judges edhopper Jun 27 #43

Dhshsjaiisirjebfjdsjsjwjwiiwiwbrbfjdjdjswjwkjaajisjdjdjdjssjsjsjjwkwjwjwjwieiejwneebdbdndjxkxiidieieiejebdndnxbxbzbsbabj SSJVegeta Jun 27 #7

Well, there goes the last levee... Hugin Jun 27 #9

On positive side, we aren't bound by 5th Circuit, arguably most right-wing federal appellate court in the country. Silent Type Jun 27 #10

This is a really good point. SSJVegeta Jun 27 #12

True, it does also neuter Kazmeryck tinrobot Jun 27 #39

and Reed O'Connor, a different Texas right-wing nut judge, who declared the entirety of the ACA unconstitutional In It to Win It Jun 27 #60

The Trump Supreme Whorehouse doesn't disappoint. dalton99a Jun 27 #13

Big, centralized government is their end goal berniesandersmittens Jun 27 #17

To use my 18-year-old's vernacular, this country is cooked. nt TBF Jun 27 #19

This opens the door to all sorts of horrors Johnny2X2X Jun 27 #22

Any vestige of impartiality is gone Arazi Jun 27 #23

THIS court is determined to ALWAYS stretch their words to somehow always bluestarone Jun 27 #24

His Whorehouse is really the best dalton99a Jun 27 #25

Tell me about it! They always find just enough wiggle room to let him do whatever the fuck he wants In It to Win It Jun 27 #26

JMFC! underpants Jun 27 #27

It hits the pocket book for sure............ Lovie777 Jun 27 #28

"How many people can afford to take it to the supreme court?" markodochartaigh Jun 27 #29

always about him always. AllaN01Bear Jun 27 #34

OK then lift the fucking injunction Dr. Shepper Jun 27 #41

The Constitution is dead. orangecrush Jun 27 #46

AND DENVERPOPS Jun 27 #51

How was it justified? MaineBlueBear Jun 27 #47

The biggest users of "nationwide injunctions" were the RW loon courts in the 5th Circuit BumRushDaShow Jun 27 #52

Ain't no standard like a double MaineBlueBear Jun 27 #58

I'd respond to this news, Escaped Floridian Jun 27 #48

Shockingly, Trump gets it wrong. mahatmakanejeeves Jun 27 #49

We Better Take Advantage Too North Coast Lawyer Jun 27 #50

That is if I_UndergroundPanther Jun 27 #54

It'll Happen North Coast Lawyer Jun 27 #56

This is going to be a nightmare splano Jun 27 #53

This is bad purple_haze Jun 27 #57

A couple of Class Action lawsuits have already been filed to get around this ruling LetMyPeopleVote Jun 27 #59