Maddow Blog-Trump's IRS says churches can now endorse political candidates from the pulpit [View all]
By allowing houses of worship to endorse candidates, despite federal tax law, the IRS is fixing a problem that doesnt exist, while inviting new ones.
By allowing houses of worship to endorse candidates, the IRS isnât just âfixingâ a problem that doesnât exist.
Itâs also inviting new problems that donât currently exist. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-07-08T17:07:48.796Z
For nearly seven decades, federal tax law has been clear: Houses of worship are entitled to tax-exempt status, but theyre not allowed to intervene in partisan political campaigns. As The New York Times reported, under Donald Trump, the IRS has unilaterally decided to interpret federal tax law in a new and unique way.
The I.R.S. said on Monday that churches and other houses of worship can endorse political candidates to their congregations, carving out an exemption in a decades-old ban on political activity by tax-exempt nonprofits. The agency made that statement in a court filing intended to settle a lawsuit filed by two Texas churches and an association of Christian broadcasters.
Under the Internal Revenue Services new approach
, all nonprofit 501(c)3 organizations will continue to enjoy tax-exempt status, but houses of worship will enjoy a new benefit that the agency wont apply to secular organizations: Churches, temples, synagogues and mosques will be free to endorse candidates, but other nonprofit groups will not.
If youre thinking this incongruity seems like the sort of thing that will end up in court, youre not alone......
As for why the IRSs new approach matters, theres potential for dramatic consequences if houses of worship become tools of political campaigns.
Imagine the campaign finance mess that would exist if parties, candidates and political action committees could funnel donations through tax exempt churches, free of oversight, all while benefiting from explicit endorsements.
For that matter, imagine if a foreign government, eager to secretly help put a specific candidate in power, decides to funnel money to specific churches, knowing that those ministries would in turn use the resources to support that candidate. The churches would never have to disclose any of this, and the public would be kept in the dark.
The IRSs new position fixes a problem that doesnt exist. There doesnt appear to be any great public demand for such a change most Americans, and even many religious leaders, dont want churches to endorse candidates and theres no reason to create a mess where none currently exists.
And yet, Trumps IRS is apparently doing it anyway.