Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,621 posts)
18. Not all of them were weak
Thu Aug 21, 2025, 12:19 PM
Aug 2025

But this one was pretty clearly the most likely to be tossed.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

JMFC underpants Aug 2025 #1
Full Putin. orangecrush Aug 2025 #2
The prosecutors showed hundreds of millions of dollars both tax fraud and bank fraud? JT45242 Aug 2025 #3
I don't understand the justification NJCher Aug 2025 #4
Here is a little from another link MichMan Aug 2025 #7
thanks. appreciate the effort to provide real info/answers stopdiggin Aug 2025 #12
Another Trumplican judge D_Master81 Aug 2025 #5
It was a 5 judge panel in NY state MichMan Aug 2025 #6
And... DET Aug 2025 #11
Have you read the decision? onenote Aug 2025 #19
No DET Aug 2025 #25
There's only one republican appointee on a court of 22 judges FBaggins Aug 2025 #16
He's fucking 1,000,000% above the law. spanone Aug 2025 #8
From $500 Million to Zero ??? C_U_L8R Aug 2025 #9
probably returns to the lower court, to be 'corrected' stopdiggin Aug 2025 #13
The court didn't really uphold his guilt FBaggins Aug 2025 #17
Thanks for clarifying, FB C_U_L8R Aug 2025 #22
The adjudication remains. Tommy Carcetti Aug 2025 #10
Well, again the one problem continues. bluestarone Aug 2025 #14
This is ForgedCrank Aug 2025 #15
Not all of them were weak FBaggins Aug 2025 #18
And now ForgedCrank Aug 2025 #21
I'm curious as to whether anyone posting in this thread has read the opinions? onenote Aug 2025 #20
A little over 1/3 of it FBaggins Aug 2025 #23
Statement by AG James LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2025 #24
Why is an Acting US Attitude (Habba) issuing a statement on this? underpants Aug 2025 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Aug 2025 #29
Presumably she was commenting as the attorney who represented Trump in the trial back in 2023-24 onenote Aug 2025 #30
Okay. underpants Aug 2025 #31
He's still liable - clarification from CNN. spooky3 Aug 2025 #27
Some state judges sound like they want to moniss Aug 2025 #28
Deadline: Legal Blog-The Trump civil fraud case is a mess. Another round of appeal could clean it up. LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2025 #32
Thank you orangecrush Aug 2025 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New York appeals court ha...»Reply #18