Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bucolic_frolic

(52,242 posts)
5. I think this post means
Wed Sep 3, 2025, 10:15 AM
Wednesday

OBLITERATING the criminal code by scrambling rulings with nonsense, obfuscation, and DoubleSpeak is the same as breaking the law in a traditional sense, therefore partisan judges should be subject to the same penalties as traditional criminals.

There's a lot there that has never been articulated in concepts in the English Language. Is there a term for judicial rulings that rule the exact opposite of what the law clearly says? No. Never been an issue before.

The boundaries of jurisprudence? Unclear in the concept of looking the other way. Sort of like law enforcement in a one-Sheriff town.

The OP gets high marks for saying a lot while saying little. Could be a future SCOTUS Justice!

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think you are making stuff up and your post does not make sense grammatically as it can be read multiple ways Bernardo de La Paz Wednesday #1
It would ForgedCrank Wednesday #2
Great Post! Kid Berwyn Wednesday #3
but will they? samsingh Wednesday #4
I think this post means bucolic_frolic Wednesday #5
Let's Review the Process and Probabilty PBC_Democrat Wednesday #6
They could be term limited however.... getagrip_already Wednesday #7
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS partisan judges ca...»Reply #5