Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(11,785 posts)

2. We saw the text, not the drawing and not his signature.

Tue Sep 9, 2025, 10:23 AM

Sep 9

The drawing was reported to be of a "woman". The actual drawing seems to be younger than that.

Plus, the creep signed it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question: Why is the release of that revolting birthday card such a big, [View all] niyad Sep 9 OP

Because it's being reported by MSM underpants Sep 9 #1

We saw the text, not the drawing and not his signature. tinrobot Sep 9 #2

No, we saw the whole thing. niyad Sep 9 #5

We did not. The image back then was fake newdeal2 Sep 9 #7

And yet that was the image we saw, the same sick image. niyad Sep 9 #9

Can you show me that image from July then? newdeal2 Sep 9 #10

You are mistaken. Not the same image. MerryBlooms Sep 9 #16

No we didn't - we saw a drawing of the drawing malaise Sep 9 #18

Because all the G.O.P. lies about the letter BoRaGard Sep 9 #4

I guess because it's a primary source. But who else contributed??? SheltieLover Sep 9 #6

What you saw earlier were fakes and speculation. Go look at them. WhiskeyGrinder Sep 9 #8

My Question RobinA Sep 9 #12

+1 leftstreet Sep 9 #13

Magats MerryBlooms Sep 9 #17

This will finally destroy him malaise Sep 9 #19

His arrogance and hubris will be his downfall. Kath2 Sep 9 #14

And may it be SOON!!! niyad Sep 9 #15

Well, it's more evidence he's guilty. Initech Sep 9 #20