Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

avebury

(11,167 posts)
7. If Barbie wanna be Lawyer only presented the document
Thu Oct 9, 2025, 07:40 PM
Thursday

with the box checked designating it is for a primary residency then I don't think that they will get a conviction. Listening to Nicole Wallace they were talking about other pages clearly stating that the house was not James' primary residency. James will have a top notch defense team and they need to make sure that the entire loan package is included in the evidence. Many years ago I was a Loan Review Officer so I have reviewed thousands of loan documents and have a pretty good idea of what they will find in the packet. If they strictly restricted what the grand jurors saw that tells me that there is stuff in the packet that have a good chance of blowing up the case for the Prosecutor.

Had I been on the Grand Jury and we could ask questions I would have asked to see the entire loan packet. I would love to be on the jury for the trial.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Grand Jury only heard one side of the story (Trump's) and it didn't no_hypocrisy Thursday #1
I hope Ms. James comes out with her side soon and loud. Baitball Blogger Thursday #2
The motivation ForgedCrank Thursday #12
What are you talking about? choie Thursday #16
An indictment ForgedCrank Thursday #18
Right so you think choie Thursday #19
You are ForgedCrank Friday #20
I did not know that Grand Juries were presented with anonymous charges. maxsolomon Thursday #3
Exactly. Otherwise, you might have jury nullification where the charges no_hypocrisy Thursday #5
If I was on the Grand Jury I don't care who the charges are tied to, avebury Thursday #9
As I understand it, there were two seperate grand juries GoCubsGo Friday #23
A federal grand jury backed the indictment on Comey as well. W_HAMILTON Thursday #4
He wants her to drop his fines and charges. Irish_Dem Thursday #6
If Barbie wanna be Lawyer only presented the document avebury Thursday #7
The indictment is actually related to a different purchase than the debunked 2023 "primary residence" accusation. pat_k Thursday #11
The debunked case was related to a 2023 purchase. This is related to a 2020 purchase. Nevertheless, likely bullshit. pat_k Thursday #8
thanks for the actual facts. WarGamer Thursday #14
It was fannie mae Oldvet Friday #21
Ms James didn't get to be in her position by being careless of the facts. I actually heard a comment today Deuxcents Thursday #10
Yes. I have little doubt the indictment is crap. See background on the charges and speculation in post 8. pat_k Thursday #13
Has no legs and hopefully Halligan will soon be disbarred vapor2 Thursday #15
grand jury indictments only have as much credibility as the prosecutor who makes the presentation to them bigtree Thursday #17
I saw on MSNBC... Chemical Bill Friday #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anyone want to pitch in o...»Reply #7