Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

avebury

(11,167 posts)

12. There was a page on a document where the box was checked that

Reply to Fiendish Thingy (Reply #1)

Thu Oct 9, 2025, 07:50 PM

Thursday

makes it look like the purchased property was to be James' primary residence. So they are claiming that she committed fraud.

On NIcole Wallace's show they mentioned that there were at least 2 other documents where it was clearly spelled out that it was not James' primary residence. The speculated that the Grand Jury were only shown the document with the check mark.

I think that once a jury sees the entire loan file the Prosecutor's case will fall apart.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nac Mac Feegle Wednesdays

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Attorney General Letitia James Issues Statement on Donald Trump's Weaponization of the Department of Justice [View all] Quiet Em Thursday OP

What is she charged with? Fiendish Thingy Thursday #1

Yup. Halligan, again. Quiet Em Thursday #2

Another source of "lip service" for Jabba-the-Trump, no doubt peppertree Thursday #9

"bank fraud" (I read elsewhere on DU). Might be the crutch they always rely on: mortgage fraud Bernardo de La Paz Thursday #4

And Adam Schiff. maxsolomon Thursday #7

A bit more background in post 14 pat_k Thursday #18

Supposedly 1 count of mortgage fraud, MarineCombatEngineer Thursday #6

I think she is charged with taking a loan claiming it was on her primary residence when it wasn't. surfered Thursday #10

See post 14. The indictment involves a different purchase and different charge (but is nevertheless likely crap) pat_k Thursday #17

There was a page on a document where the box was checked that avebury Thursday #12

No. That was the debunked case on the 2023 purchase. The likely BS Indictment is on a 2020 purchase. pat_k Thursday #15

The debunked case was related to a 2023 purchase. This is related to a 2020 purchase. Nevertheless, likely bullshit. pat_k Thursday #14

This is what courage looks like. Irish_Dem Thursday #3

I hate that.motherfucker (trump) choie Thursday #5

Under Trump, nothing good can happen Johonny Thursday #8

One thing that rarely gets mentioned in coverage of these cases (hers and Schiff's) dsc Thursday #11

Remains to be seen. This indictment isn't related to the 2023 debunked case. It is related to a 2020 purchase pat_k Thursday #19

OK that is my bad dsc Thursday #20

Very well said! Botany Thursday #13

the revenge department and the just us system. AllaN01Bear Thursday #16

K&R UTUSN Thursday #21