Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Chemical Bill

(2,954 posts)

22. I saw on MSNBC...

Reply to Baitball Blogger (Original post)

Fri Oct 10, 2025, 07:06 AM

Friday

that this was the first day that the grand jury was in session. This may help explain things, as the folks may have been unable to see beyond the presentation. A more experienced group might not have been as persuadable.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Baitball Blogger

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Anyone want to pitch in on the Leticia James indictment? [View all] Baitball Blogger Thursday OP

The Grand Jury only heard one side of the story (Trump's) and it didn't no_hypocrisy Thursday #1

I hope Ms. James comes out with her side soon and loud. Baitball Blogger Thursday #2

The motivation ForgedCrank Thursday #12

What are you talking about? choie Thursday #16

An indictment ForgedCrank Thursday #18

Right so you think choie Thursday #19

You are ForgedCrank Friday #20

I did not know that Grand Juries were presented with anonymous charges. maxsolomon Thursday #3

Exactly. Otherwise, you might have jury nullification where the charges no_hypocrisy Thursday #5

If I was on the Grand Jury I don't care who the charges are tied to, avebury Thursday #9

As I understand it, there were two seperate grand juries GoCubsGo Friday #23

A federal grand jury backed the indictment on Comey as well. W_HAMILTON Thursday #4

He wants her to drop his fines and charges. Irish_Dem Thursday #6

If Barbie wanna be Lawyer only presented the document avebury Thursday #7

The indictment is actually related to a different purchase than the debunked 2023 "primary residence" accusation. pat_k Thursday #11

The debunked case was related to a 2023 purchase. This is related to a 2020 purchase. Nevertheless, likely bullshit. pat_k Thursday #8

thanks for the actual facts. WarGamer Thursday #14

It was fannie mae Oldvet Friday #21

Ms James didn't get to be in her position by being careless of the facts. I actually heard a comment today Deuxcents Thursday #10

Yes. I have little doubt the indictment is crap. See background on the charges and speculation in post 8. pat_k Thursday #13

Has no legs and hopefully Halligan will soon be disbarred vapor2 Thursday #15

grand jury indictments only have as much credibility as the prosecutor who makes the presentation to them bigtree Thursday #17

I saw on MSNBC... Chemical Bill Friday #22