Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I asked ChatGPT to rewrite "American Pie" to be more contemporary... [View all]Layzeebeaver
(2,092 posts)16. "wrecks the environment"?????
does nothing else "wreck the environment"?
Don't specifically select something out of context.
Fossil Fuel driven electricity giving you the internet connectivity to reply to this post?
Animal experimentation providing society with protection against contagions?
can we just stop with the false segmentation of values?
What exactly are we all fighting for here?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I asked ChatGPT to rewrite "American Pie" to be more contemporary... [View all]
Layzeebeaver
Yesterday
OP
actually, its not slop. I played a core part in framing and editing of this.
Layzeebeaver
Yesterday
#2
Your use of ChatGPT is unethical, if you're aware of the many news stories and the many posts here
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#7
Yes. Of course. It would be your own work. The difference is obvious. Just as there's an obvious
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#11
Please look up the meaning of "understudy" because you obviously don't know it.
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#49
No, it isn't. If you're using AI without being forced to do so by your job or school, and you're aware
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#43
If you'd talked to the near-suicidal artists, writers and teachers (who see their students being dumbed down)
highplainsdem
6 hrs ago
#56
Write it yourself. Don't use an unethical tool trained on stolen intellectual property.
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#8
Stop being so silly. No one suggested that. I love tech that actually helps, and I had an HP laser printer
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#44
You don't want it stealing YOUR stuff, but you're fine with it being trained on all the writing by other people
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#45
Exactly. And there's nothing creative about having genAI do something for you.
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#47
The people who'll be hurt by AI tools that dumb them down are not the ones refusing to participate
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#46
Boring and vague. Not a fan of the original, but at least the wordplay and references in it mean something.
WhiskeyGrinder
Yesterday
#13
Damage to the envirinment is just one of a number of harms from genAI and the data centers being
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#17
There's no way to use genAI built on theft ethically. That's like saying you'll use slave labor ethically.
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#22
We can try to prevent worse from happening, or we can let it happen by saying "we've already come so far, why not
WhiskeyGrinder
Yesterday
#19
Fighting for open-mindedness? About something that reduces creativity, reduces brain activity, plagiarizes art
WhiskeyGrinder
Yesterday
#24
An inspiration by itself isn't music, or a book, or a painting. Just having an idea does not entitle you
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#48
Ethics is not a separate topic. It's inherent when this tech exists only because of stolen IP. The fact
highplainsdem
4 hrs ago
#59
Way too much Democratic whining over this worthy portrayal of current events. (nt)
Paladin
Yesterday
#42
considering the environmental and ethical issues involving this kind of slop
Blue_Adept
4 hrs ago
#60