Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,228 posts)
13. He didn't want the Dems to concede.
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 10:59 AM
Nov 2025

"I think the decision to cave is dumb". He did not think the filibuster was worth keeping - "eventually Rs would’ve been forced to nuke. Fine by me."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NOPE! gab13by13 Nov 2025 #1
I disagree on his take on the filibuster bucolic_frolic Nov 2025 #2
What use is it if we won't use it? Happy Hoosier Nov 2025 #3
Dems got nothing Johnny2X2X Nov 2025 #4
Oh, okay Alpeduez21 Nov 2025 #5
I'm not sure what you're saying muriel_volestrangler Nov 2025 #9
I'm saying he's just another dumbass arguing Alpeduez21 Nov 2025 #12
He didn't want the Dems to concede. muriel_volestrangler Nov 2025 #13
The courts were not firmly on our side FBaggins Nov 2025 #6
Filibuster mostly helps the GOP and it hurts Democrats a LOT more. I would have much rather that... Jbraybarten Nov 2025 #7
Then why don't they simply say so? Hugin Nov 2025 #8
the filibuster gives an advantage to republicans samsingh Nov 2025 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author BannonsLiver Nov 2025 #11
Either way, whatever the reason, it was an act of cowardice. Nt Fiendish Thingy Nov 2025 #14
DURec leftstreet Nov 2025 #15
We showed them, lol. Emile Nov 2025 #16
Listed as the secondary reason here muriel_volestrangler Nov 2025 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another possible reason f...»Reply #13