Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: "Abstruse?" [View all]

Historic NY

(39,538 posts)
2. No something is WONG vs US. which clarified birthright
Sun Dec 7, 2025, 11:56 AM
Sunday

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/a-look-back-at-the-wong-kim-ark-decision]

https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/amendment-xiv/clauses/700]

The US Constitution in counting census is to count all people in the US citizen or not.

By the end of the Revolutionary War in 1783 all persons were considered citizens of the states in which they lived & Allegiance to the new country. By 1790 naturalization was dependent on 2 yrs residence and being white.

The jus soli principle (right of the soil) from English common law applied, meaning most people born within U.S. territory were considered natural-born citizens, with some exceptions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Abstruse?"»Reply #2