Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have always assumed it was because the publicans and sinners were jealous that we had both an adverb and a noun. jls4561 Dec 2025 #1
It's a shibboleth! Fozzledick Dec 2025 #2
It's supposed to distance the name from the idea Klarkashton Dec 2025 #3
Thom Hartmann has this explanation: Liberal In Texas Dec 2025 #4
It's also a well known way to create a slur, which is why Republicans do it. W_HAMILTON Dec 2025 #5
Congratulations on 10,000 posts. usonian Dec 2025 #7
Oh, wow, thank you! I wouldn't have even realized it... W_HAMILTON Dec 2025 #8
Number of posts doesn't show on small screens, only larget ones, and I notice! usonian Dec 2025 #9
A remnant The Wizard Dec 2025 #6
Limbaugh used it as an intentional slight. czarjak Dec 2025 #10
I tell anyone who uses it to ... Whiskeytide Dec 2025 #11
They only use it because it gets under our skin MichMan Dec 2025 #12
People who live in glass houses...... DFW Dec 2025 #13
What are you talking about? Maraya1969 Dec 2025 #14
"Republican's use" should be either "Republican use" or "Republicans' use" muriel_volestrangler Dec 2025 #15
I am using it like "Their use of it" Maraya1969 Dec 2025 #16
In that case, the apostrophe should come after the "s" (nt) muriel_volestrangler Dec 2025 #17
You got it n/t DFW Dec 2025 #18
I believe that referring to the Republican Party as the NAZI Party would be Jack Valentino Dec 2025 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The explanation of why Re...»Reply #16