General Discussion

Wednesdays

(22,270 posts)

30. Amen.

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Sun Mar 1, 2026, 04:47 PM

18 hrs ago

K&R.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

highplainsdem

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Please do not post AI-generated text, whether OPs or replies, without labeling them AI-generated and naming the AI used. [View all] highplainsdem 22 hrs ago OP

Absolutely! pat_k 21 hrs ago #1

I'm glad you label it, but why bother posting what any chatbot says when it might give a different answer highplainsdem 20 hrs ago #7

Very true. AI generated content looks and sounds authoritative, even when it's not mdbl 20 hrs ago #10

I always question AI - ask for quotes, womanofthehills 19 hrs ago #14

That will NOT prevent it from lying. Ms. Toad 18 hrs ago #35

This is an AI Video... leftstreet 21 hrs ago #2

It's still slop. It's still dumb. Our most effective weapons against Trump and his regime are real news, highplainsdem 20 hrs ago #3

I thought the subject was labeling it leftstreet 20 hrs ago #5

I'm glad you agree with the labeling. I thought you posted that video as something that you felt highplainsdem 20 hrs ago #8

bwahahaha jmbar2 20 hrs ago #4

No way ornotna 13 hrs ago #62

With some small effort one can usually find the source of this plagiarized material. hunter 20 hrs ago #6

Ah, Liechtenstein! kurtyboy 19 hrs ago #18

I agree, but...... SergeStorms 20 hrs ago #9

They don't all add disclaimers, though, here on DU or on other websites - and most of the time they highplainsdem 20 hrs ago #12

I agree SergeStorms 18 hrs ago #34

Thanks! highplainsdem 16 hrs ago #53

Thank you !!!! This should be a DU rule. Trueblue1968 20 hrs ago #11

Yes! SheltieLover 19 hrs ago #21

If people are posting AI generated text here withour saying it's AI, I agree that it should be labeled as such. ShazzieB 19 hrs ago #13

The AI overview is there to keep you in the google sandbox. hunter 17 hrs ago #47

Yes, and No ThreeNoSeep 19 hrs ago #15

Yes, they are committing fraud, i.e. plagurisim. paleotn 19 hrs ago #25

Academic researchers use other people's work all the time. (#bibliography) ThreeNoSeep 15 hrs ago #59

They cite other people's work. Other PEOPLE. Cite LLMs? paleotn 15 hrs ago #60

Theft? Nope. ThreeNoSeep 13 hrs ago #61

I'm sorry, but you're wrong. highplainsdem 18 hrs ago #28

Where are your citations for the above? jmbar2 17 hrs ago #39

Citations for what's in the excerpt boxes? Those are quotes from the message I was replying to. highplainsdem 17 hrs ago #43

They're quotes, so they need ____________________ jmbar2 17 hrs ago #45

Not when it's a quote from someone I'm replying to in an excerpt box in a reply following their message. highplainsdem 17 hrs ago #49

Agree 100%. Thank you! CaptainTruth 19 hrs ago #16

Is this a new rule or guideline? Joinfortmill 19 hrs ago #17

If not, should be. paleotn 19 hrs ago #22

I have no issue with this if it is a rule by the site owner Joinfortmill 19 hrs ago #23

They're wishing, not presenting. paleotn 19 hrs ago #26

You might want to read my post again. Joinfortmill 18 hrs ago #27

Do they have the ability to make policy? No. Then it's just wishing. paleotn 18 hrs ago #29

Read it. Joinfortmill 18 hrs ago #32

It's a request, starting with the word "please" - no more a rule or guideline than the many requests highplainsdem 18 hrs ago #33

Chill. Why the freaking anger? paleotn 18 hrs ago #36

I'm not angry. Joinfortmill 17 hrs ago #44

Then why is this such an issue for you? Seriously? paleotn 16 hrs ago #56

It is the way it was presented. Joinfortmill 16 hrs ago #57

It's a request, made because we have had chatbot responses posted here that weren't identified as highplainsdem 18 hrs ago #31

Perfectly good reasons why we should NEVER use AI for this forum. paleotn 19 hrs ago #19

Absolutely agreed! SheltieLover 19 hrs ago #20

Is this like blaming someone for holding a counterfeit banknote? Drum 19 hrs ago #24

I simply put many of these AI enthusiasts on my ignore list. hunter 17 hrs ago #40

Agreed! Drum 17 hrs ago #42

It's possible I decry this new industry more than highplainsdem does. hunter 16 hrs ago #55

Amen. Wednesdays 18 hrs ago #30

I'm here for the humans. carpetbagger 18 hrs ago #37

LOL! I hope we all are. Heaven help this board if very much of it turns into a place to trade highplainsdem 18 hrs ago #38

Do we need to know the political affiliation of the chatbot? MichMan 17 hrs ago #41

And their pronouns jmbar2 17 hrs ago #46

This isn't in the TOS. It's a request made for the reasons explained in the OP. And identifying the chatbot helps highplainsdem 17 hrs ago #50

I come to DU to find out what other people think. AI doesn't think. It's "artificial!" nt LAS14 17 hrs ago #48

Exactly. There are already too many responses from bots in a lot of other online forums. highplainsdem 16 hrs ago #58

I ask that an AI tag be added to the subject line so those of us who find AI revolting can easily Trash it a SheltieLover 17 hrs ago #51

I think a trigger warning might be more appropriate jmbar2 16 hrs ago #52

It's not a trigger for me, but AI in subject makes it easier to trash in settings. SheltieLover 16 hrs ago #54

I'm starting to think you don't care about any other issue. FascismIsDeath 13 hrs ago #63

Really? I've posted about lots of other issues, here and on other platforms. highplainsdem 12 hrs ago #64

"AI slop" has became the equivalent of using "woke" as a pejorative. FascismIsDeath 11 hrs ago #65

You don't seem to understand that people choosing to use and promote a technology they know is unethical and highplainsdem 9 hrs ago #66

Jawohl! LPBBEAR 50 min ago #67