Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sympthsical

(10,971 posts)
26. Absolutely. Those are the bad ones.
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 06:58 AM
Wednesday

I worked in social services for years. Currently in nursing school and working as a behavioral therapist as my day job (different kind of therapy - I work with kids with autism to help with developmental disability).

The first thing we ask, across all three areas, is what kind of support structures they have. Family, friends, community. Any health care worker, mental or physical, who isn't including support structures isn't doing their job. We can only do so much. At the end of the day, the success of interventions is frequently heavily dependent on whether or not someone has adequate social support. Be that addiction, mental illness, developmental disability, poor physical health, etc.

First question a nurse asks, "Do you have anyone at home?" Not only does lack of support make success less likely, it makes a healthcare worker's job indescribably more difficult.

Any so-called professional who stands there telling you they - and they alone - have all the answers and will fix you is selling something.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Its junk science, all of it. Johonny Tuesday #1
Suicide the final outcome? yankee87 Tuesday #3
We need to fire all of Rupert Murdoch's clowns at every level. Initech Tuesday #2
Weird ruling. Free speech behind a closed door medical treatment. bucolic_frolic Tuesday #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Sympthsical Tuesday #5
Was hate speech ever illegal? pcdb Tuesday #12
There is not a "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment. tritsofme Wednesday #28
It was pretty clear cut in this instance Sympthsical Tuesday #6
The law protects abhorrent speech too EdmondDantes_ Tuesday #7
Except they clearly don't believe that dsc Tuesday #8
Perfect answer yankee87 Tuesday #10
Sotomayor and Kagan didn't cocur with that decision Jose Garcia Tuesday #13
No they didn't but Alito, Thomas, and Roberts surely did dsc Tuesday #14
But they both did concur with the cons in this case. Celerity Tuesday #15
Disagree yankee87 Tuesday #11
There are a lot of terrible therapists in this world Sympthsical Tuesday #19
Kagan touched on this in her concurrence Shrek Wednesday #27
Therapy itself is questionable gulliver Tuesday #9
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #17
I've no doubt you've met more than your share n/t Torchlight Tuesday #23
Questionable at its best. Cerulean Southpaw Tuesday #18
There are good and bad therapists Sympthsical Tuesday #20
Your point about the importance of social support... gulliver Tuesday #24
Absolutely. Those are the bad ones. Sympthsical Wednesday #26
In every profession there are the good and bad luv2fly Tuesday #25
I Wonder if this will Pave the Way... NEOH Tuesday #16
Sad, but true yankee87 Tuesday #21
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court sides with Christian counselor over Colorado on 'conversion therapy' for minors LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #22
I am EXTREMELY disappointed that Justices Kagan and Sotomayor went along with this . . . markpkessinger Wednesday #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US Supreme Court rejects ...»Reply #26