Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,969 posts)
61. MaddowBlog-Why John Roberts' defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive
Thu May 7, 2026, 08:03 PM
May 7

Justices should consider not only why most believe the high court is motivated by politics, but also their own role in fueling the problem they find offensive.

Why John Roberts’ defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Philly Joe (@joehick58.bsky.social) 2026-05-07T22:39:16.924Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/john-roberts-defense-supreme-court-unpersuasive

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is clearly aware of public perceptions related to the high court, though he apparently wants Americans to see him and fellow justices as above the political fray. The Associated Press reported on his latest public remarks:

I think, at a very basic level, people think we’re making policy decisions, we’re saying we think this is how things should be, as opposed to what the law provides,” he said. “I think they view us as purely political actors, which I don’t think is an accurate understanding of what we do.”

His remarks to a conference of judges and lawyers from the 3rd U.S. Circuit in Pennsylvania came at a time of low public confidence in the court, and about a week after the court handed down a decision that hollowed out the Voting Rights Act.


As part of the same remarks, Roberts went on to argue that sitting justices are not “part of the political process … and I’m not sure people grasp that as much as is appropriate.”.....

Why does the public see the justices, as Roberts put it, as “political actors”? It might have something to do with far-right justices issuing regressive and reactionary rulings. And far-right justices getting caught up in indefensible ethics controversies. And far-right justices elevating the presidency above the law.

But I suspect one of the main reasons so many people see justices as “political actors” is the frequency with which they act like political actors. Right around the same time that the public was learning about Roberts’ remarks, Justice Neil Gorsuch, who has a track record of chatting with conservative media personalities, appeared on a conservative podcast, talking about his belief that “young conservatives must have courage to stand by their beliefs.”....

Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut argued five years ago, “Judges turning into political actors, giving speeches attacking journalists, is terrible for the court and terrible for democracy.” Justices proceeded to ignore the warning.

The tarnishing of the Supreme Court — its credibility, its integrity and its reputation — has unfolded episodically over the course of several years. If Roberts and his brethren want to whine about public reactions to their work, that’s their right, but if they want to help restore the institution’s standing, they have an enormous amount of work to do. To date, they have shown no willingness whatsoever to even acknowledge the causes of the Supreme Court’s problems, much less take steps to address what ails it.

Roberts is a racist asshole who has been plotting to overturn or gut the Voting Rights Act since Roberts' days in the Reagan DOJ. I still remember reading the Shelby County opinion and dissent where Roberts gutted Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. That was NOT a legal opinion but a policy decision based on Roberts' belief that there was no longer racial prejudice. Alito's opinion is merely a continuation of the racist policies of the six asshole SCOTUS justices.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That was good for a laugh stumpysbear May 6 #1
We, the public, are not the problem. C_U_L8R May 6 #2
We are too fucking stupid to understand displacedvermoter May 6 #3
Kiss my ass John, i have eyes. dem4decades May 6 #4
we didn't until you fucking HACKS came along Skittles May 6 #5
I believe this POS worked with Bush's team Stargleamer May 6 #6
FIVE REPUBLICAN-appointed justices voted to abrogate their duties niyad May 6 #18
And even more egregious is 2 of them. . . Stargleamer May 6 #26
Exactly!!!! niyad May 6 #34
Roberts, Kavanaugh and Coney-Barrett aided Bush in 2000 DemocracyForever May 8 #62
I AM free to criticize. Hey Johnny. GFY. johnnyfins May 6 #7
Don't insult us with your b.s. Roberts. Diamond_Dog May 6 #8
As a retired empiricist, I suggest Roberts take an intro course in examining data. spooky3 May 6 #9
Nailed it malaise May 6 #13
why, thank you! spooky3 May 6 #15
The data speaks for itself malaise May 6 #16
He's gaslighting, and he knows it. And corrupt to the core. nt spooky3 May 6 #17
Then there's this malaise May 6 #20
Piece of shit. nt spooky3 May 6 #21
I never forgot it malaise May 6 #23
One of his colleagues just said progressivism can't exist in the USA. In It to Win It May 6 #24
LIAR.. add that to your legacy, John Roberts. nt Cha May 6 #10
If it walks like a duck, etc. niyad May 6 #11
Or, if it gaslights like a MAGA........ wnylib May 6 #43
TRANSLATION: Klansman in robes tries to blow smoke up our bums. B.See May 6 #12
Mr Balls and strikes can go F himself. themaguffin May 6 #14
This is like saying the car dealership exists to keep your maintenance costs low bucolic_frolic May 6 #19
Not wrongly. Not wrongly. Baitball Blogger May 6 #22
He's right, we shouldn't see them as political actors Terry_M May 6 #25
Anyone reading the Writings of Alito and Thomas know that Robert's is full of it. lostincalifornia May 6 #27
Poor John thinks we are ignorant ones MagickMuffin May 6 #28
Vain racist piggy so worried how history will view him that he's telling us what to think? Attilatheblond May 6 #29
That hack can pound sand. City Lights May 6 #30
He is so full of himself - TBF May 6 #31
What a load of bullshit... appmanga May 6 #32
+1. Roberts is a virulent racist and a traitor to the Constitution dalton99a May 6 #40
They are traitors enabling a coup against our democracy. Until they are removed it will continue to get worse. Blues Heron May 6 #33
lololol Give it up, dude. You're a piece of shit. Stop trying to convince people otherwise. Solly Mack May 6 #35
Geez, he is beyond pathetic... Spazito May 6 #36
yes Skittles May 7 #59
Then maybe the court shouldn't rule as if they are political actors... haele May 6 #37
If it walks like a duck....... vapor2 May 6 #38
Political actors?? No way !! MW67 May 6 #39
Also known as whores dalton99a May 6 #41
I'm not a lawyer but the 14th amendment article # 3 explicitly said that Trump could not run again Botany May 6 #42
Not actors. usonian May 6 #44
Why were 6 justices invited to dinner with trump/king charles??? IcyPeas May 6 #45
He's telling us not to believe our lying ears and eyes. tavernier May 6 #46
I think of them more as political puppets than political actors. dgauss May 6 #47
Says the guy angrychair May 6 #48
F Him. All they do is rule on politically charged issues Bristlecone May 6 #49
The whole abortion issue canetoad May 6 #50
Sorry, JR, the Fecal Matter Has Been Conspicuously Oozing from you and Your Lying Covert for Years Now The Roux Comes First May 6 #51
More like political, racist, malfeasant actors Scalded Nun May 6 #52
"Damn! It's getting so we get called partisan hacks every fuckin time we act like partisan hacks! It's so unfair!" struggle4progress May 6 #53
He said it with a straight face ? rickford66 May 6 #54
Watch what they do, not what they say. ☮ walkingman May 6 #55
Yeah well, get glasses Johnny Bob. Dave Bowman May 6 #56
Hated the VRA since the early 80s? moondust May 7 #57
Thanks to RW SCOTUS justices... Jacson6 May 7 #58
Anybody who is Federalist Society is anti-American. valleyrogue May 7 #60
MaddowBlog-Why John Roberts' defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive LetMyPeopleVote May 7 #61
Clyburn: "I think Justice Roberts is gonna take his place alongside some other justices, like Taney LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #63
Lying phony justice says corrupt liars are not liars Mysterian Sunday #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chief Justice John Robert...»Reply #61