Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EdmondDantes_

(2,061 posts)
11. The constitution doesn't mention the 30,000 population districts
Mon May 11, 2026, 09:08 AM
May 11

Madison recommended it, but it was never put in.

Also those same founders thought slaves were worth 3/5ths and generally that only white men who owned property could vote. They weren't perfect.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's a very true take on it. No gerrymander will help Senators. bucolic_frolic May 11 #1
The founding fathers knew Whip-poor-will May 11 #2
The constitution doesn't mention the 30,000 population districts EdmondDantes_ May 11 #11
Well, kinda ITAL May 11 #16
The Northern states legally converted their slaves to indentured unc70 May 11 #20
There were plenty of slaves in the north ITAL May 11 #21
The way my constitution copy reads Whip-poor-will May 11 #18
Yes. Flipping the Senate has to be a top priority now... though I still think they screwed themselves with a lot of LymphocyteLover May 11 #3
The senate is already gerrymandered (and then some) FBaggins May 11 #4
Yes! Idaho, N&S Dakota, Wyoming, and Montana combine for 10 Senators, but have fewer people than Los Angeles. TheRickles May 11 #5
Its awful and impossible to change Johonny May 11 #22
Exactly right - I came here to say the same FakeNoose May 11 #6
Agree. This was the Founders intention. That via the Senate, every state gets equal representation no matter population Cheezoholic May 11 #7
It was a compromise that induced the agrarian (low population density) states to join the Republic. TheRickles May 11 #23
Jamelle Bouie recommends increasing it to six senators per state Fiendish Thingy May 11 #13
That would require an amendment FBaggins May 11 #14
Changing the size of the house would not. Fiendish Thingy May 11 #17
Fantasyland stuff. Totally unrealistic. BannonsLiver May 11 #19
This is the time for Democrats in red states to use strategic voting... appmanga May 11 #8
Not all states allow that radical noodle May 11 #10
I believe LA is an open jungle primary... appmanga May 11 #12
I am hopeful. But be prepared for anything. It's a war. Joinfortmill May 11 #9
Gerrymandering doesn't work when you alienate your voters RainCaster May 11 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans can't Gerrym...»Reply #11