General Discussion

Response to Joinfortmill (Reply #16)

Name removed Message auto-removed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

96 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I see that James Talarico is doing something that Kamala did not [View all] senseandsensibility Wednesday OP

Yes! leftieNanner Wednesday #1

Yes, he must do many things at once senseandsensibility Wednesday #3

It's a big ask of anyone peggysue2 Wednesday #41

Kick dalton99a Wednesday #2

It is also important he confronts MAGA christianity about their bastardization of Christianity. travelingthrulife Wednesday #4

I'm not particularly religious so maybe I'm not a good judge senseandsensibility Wednesday #5

Agreed. I am not religious either. His voice is important. travelingthrulife Yesterday #87

The distinction is between Christian Nationalism and Christianity. pat_k Wednesday #30

That is a must-see for clarity. Festivito Wednesday #65

That sermon put him on my radar at the end of 2023. pat_k Wednesday #67

They aren't all Christian Nationalists though, many just have a really hateful interpretation travelingthrulife Yesterday #88

If they have no interest in discriminating or reshaping law in accord with their beliefs, they aren't violating... pat_k 22 hrs ago #91

My thoughts exactly. That's why I've thought that Talarico was particularly needed at this time. summer_in_TX Wednesday #42

This is great. I want to share with my fundie Trump lovers in my family. But its way too small to read for them LiberalLovinLug 19 hrs ago #94

Here's a larger image. summer_in_TX 16 hrs ago #95

Trump needed no defining leftstreet Wednesday #6

Magas are and were a lost cause senseandsensibility Wednesday #7

No. "MAGA" is mainly about 30 million Bluetus Wednesday #11

Good points senseandsensibility Wednesday #12

I would say Obama was elected to bring us a public option in healthcare questionseverything Wednesday #22

But he hedged so much about it that he had no mandate. Bluetus Wednesday #33

That's not true Mad_Machine76 Wednesday #50

That is not my recollection Bluetus Wednesday #58

Here's a link from Wikipedia that appears to support my recollection of events Mad_Machine76 Wednesday #59

I don't deny that Lieberman screwed the pooch Bluetus Wednesday #62

I believe, however, that it was near the end of the passage of the ACA Mad_Machine76 Wednesday #64

I am sure the truth lies somewhere in that region. Politics can be very ugly Bluetus Wednesday #66

Disagree questionseverything Wednesday #61

I still genuinely believe if the Dems had RAMMED Medicare for all Americans through in 2009, we never PatrickforB Wednesday #36

The biggest problem is that we pay into Medicare throughout our spooky3 Wednesday #72

Nah, with all due respect, your post would have us all dancing at the end of the same string. PatrickforB Yesterday #76

I suggest that you do some reading on the problems in our health care spooky3 Yesterday #78

+1 leftstreet Wednesday #23

Not this again... lame54 Wednesday #43

+a zillion nt spooky3 Wednesday #71

Opportunity economy, middle class, small business, first-time house buyer subsidy, corporate price gouging, betsuni Yesterday #77

FDR who said... mountain grammy Yesterday #84

I thought Kamala ran an excellent campaign PatSeg Wednesday #8

I remember marveling at how good Kamala was during the debates senseandsensibility Wednesday #10

I agree that gender was against her PatSeg Wednesday #52

You have to draw contrasts Bluetus Wednesday #35

Except I would get rid of the 'fight hard' clause. My email box and mobile text fills up every day with dozens PatrickforB Wednesday #40

Good point. Bluetus Wednesday #56

Sorry for,having to say this, but.... reACTIONary Wednesday #70

Maybe not the best strategy SomedayKindaLove Yesterday #79

Step one for Congress is heal thyself (insider trading is legal?!) Soul_of_Wit Wednesday #48

Yes, as long as the examples are totally legitimate PatSeg Wednesday #55

IDK Lemon Lyman Wednesday #9

They needed to speak more about what what people needed wnylib Wednesday #24

Picking a convicted felon over competency is entirely because of not solving issues like housing and affordability (n/m) Soul_of_Wit Wednesday #49

There's a bit more to it. wnylib Wednesday #54

Here is exactly what I was talking about. wnylib Wednesday #63

do not forget the double standard Skittles Wednesday #13

Yes, in many ways that is the elephant in the room senseandsensibility Wednesday #14

she always had to avoid looking like the "angry black woman" Skittles Wednesday #17

It is a fact. Do we want to have our principles or do we want to win some elections so we can make these things right? Bluetus Wednesday #38

The one (principles) does not deny the other (victory) Torchlight Wednesday #47

It has so far. Bluetus Wednesday #57

Three key failures that were incredibly frustrating to watch. pat_k Wednesday #15

Kamala's problem was she was a woman. Just saying, people. Joinfortmill Wednesday #16

Message auto-removed Name removed 23 hrs ago #90

Like it or not, negative ads and action works. Good for him. NNadir Wednesday #18

Kamala should have challenged TSF to a polygraph test in the debates. Rhiagel Wednesday #19

I worked for an attorney The Wizard Wednesday #34

Research on polygraphs shows they are not sufficiently reliable, eg, see spooky3 Wednesday #74

He knew his client was lying to him The Wizard Yesterday #83

I understand that, but people widely believe polygraphs are spooky3 23 hrs ago #89

Nailed it orangecrush Wednesday #20

The only reason Harris lost is that she isn't a white male. ananda Wednesday #21

Thank you. /nt spudspud Wednesday #26

Yeah. I can hear the complaints from the always anti-Democrat morons: Zelda_Orchid Wednesday #27

Running for the Senate MineralMan Wednesday #25

He is also being a white male... displacedvermoter Wednesday #28

Every Democrat running for office needs to blast the republicOn party KS Toronado Wednesday #29

Can we please not do this? Politicub Wednesday #31

In LBJ's first run for Congress he The Wizard Wednesday #32

Wow senseandsensibility Wednesday #37

More corrupt than Trump? lame54 Wednesday #39

You don't define an opponent with a single interview. RandySF Wednesday #44

I am not sure one can ever define an opponent especially one as creepy as his. Best to just constantly define yourself. efhmc Wednesday #73

what she absolutely did not do that cost her votes yobrault1 Wednesday #45

Democrats need to be better at multitasking Soul_of_Wit Wednesday #46

The DNC could learn something from this guy gay texan Wednesday #51

Last night, Paxton broke out every stereotype from the Trump book he could find. ificandream Wednesday #53

I see.... sheshe2 Wednesday #60

Ummm... Unca Jim Wednesday #68

She called Trump an "unhinged and unstable" fascist ... oh wait, it's Kamala the Invisible, like all the betsuni Wednesday #69

Lawrence asked a repuke style question painting Rep Talarico with the pro trans kids brush. Tbear Wednesday #75

What? He isn't a Black woman? ananda Yesterday #80

Its called branding Historic NY Yesterday #81

I don't know, in those debates she pasted Trump pretty good bucolic_frolic Yesterday #82

You have a point, especially after 45 years of incessant smearing of liberals lostnfound Yesterday #85

Also bring up every time Old Crank Yesterday #86

K&R red dog 1 20 hrs ago #92

Ay, ay, ay, que rico Talarico Miami Blue 19 hrs ago #93

"the most corrupt politician in America" Danascot 2 hrs ago #96