Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nuxvomica

(14,367 posts)
2. What's really interesting about the article
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 01:42 AM
Wednesday

Is its depiction of someone so committed to the pure joy of creativity. Its a thoughtful reminder of what we lose when we allow AI to create things for us. In the series Hacks, comedy legend Deborah Vance rebuffs the attempt by a Silicon-Valley oligarch to have AI digest all her performances and create new jokes for her. Her reason is simple: she wants to write the jokes herself, to go through that struggle. It's the irreducible need to create. And typing words into an AI prompt is not enough. In Watterson's thinking, the artist should have as much control over the work as possible, so he used simple art tools and a limited palette, and did all the painting and inking himself, just as Michelangelo quarried the marble he used in his sculptures. AI allows us to avoid a lot of work but maybe we need reminding that the hard work may be something we want to do.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ran across this tonight a...»Reply #2