Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ohh That's Rich - birthright citizenship 6-3 to 5-4 ruling explained [View all]DemocracyForever
(410 posts)13. It would need to be a legal move
to reconsider the case, not an actual law.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They can always pass a law to give the Supreme Court another shot to get it "right".
Ilikepurple
Jul 1
#8
I never said reconsider the case. An actual law could be rightly challenged and reach the Supreme Court.
Ilikepurple
Thursday
#14
This is still just an opinion and one that doesn't carry the force of law if the Supreme Court decides otherwise.
Ilikepurple
Friday
#25
Four of the people who we have charged with deciding what the constitution means disagree with you.
Ms. Toad
Friday
#23
That still does not support your contention that he doesn't understand the Constitution.
Ms. Toad
15 hrs ago
#45