Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why?????????? Damn!!!! [View all]BainsBane
(57,760 posts)234. No one drove you from the site
You chose to leave because of your opposition to our nominee and the democratic system that allowed 15 million citizens to vote for her. The only way pnwmom drove you from the site is in failing to relinquish her vote to you.
Democrats are comprised of people who vote Democrat. The base is comprised of blocks of voters who vote for Democrats in the largest percentages:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factions_in_the_Democratic_Party_(United_States)#Voter_base.
Having a better sense of who represents the partys base is important for strategist and for the party once it is in office. In 2008, for example, the only groups who voted for Obama by a margin of 2-1 or better, a good measure of a true demographic base, were African Americans (95%), Latinos (67%), voters under 29 years old (66%), Jews (78%), gays and lesbians (70%). Interestingly, union members only voted 60% for Obama, meaning that among white union members it was probably closer to 50%.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lincoln-mitchell/what-is-the-democratic-pa_b_741708.html
I don't appear on that list ( though I do appear on some that account for education and marital status). I can't imagine why I should care. I still vote Democrat. I still volunteer for Democrats. I still participate in local party organizations. But then, I'm not someone who believes that I must sit at the center of all things. It has never occurred to me to be aggrieved because I am not held above the rest of the electorate.
Just because someone is not part of a demographic that most heavily votes Democratic does not mean their vote is worth less than anyone else's. But if that person does not vote for Democrats, they cannot be considered a Democrat. Stein is not a Democrat. Donald Trump is not a Democrat. Writing in someone for president, whether they are a Democrat or an independent, is not voting Democrat. That means voting for the nominee in any given race, even if that nominee is not one's personal choice--which for most of is a majority of the time. We deal with it and vote for our second, third, forth, sixth, or twelfth choice because we care about issues, policies, and core values the party represents. We operate from a sense of what is best for our community, our fellow citizens. It's not about reflexively voting D because we don't think. It's about understanding that policy and issues, and most importantly the citizenry-- matter more than any one politician or anger than the majority of the primary electorate didn't vote as we wanted.
Now, this is your goodbye message, the original one before you edited it well over a year after you posted it.
I was going to wait till the 15th, but it is clear that the wolves are howling at the door and the DU I knew will be pretty much toast after tomorrow, regardless of the results in CA. Better to just start settling into a new home now (that would be JPR of course).
Official "Goodbye DU" Post
1. We won't let the door hit us on the way out -- thanks for your concern.
2. We won't be returning while Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton is the presumptive or actual Democratic nominee -- and perhaps not even after her inevitable fall. That should comfort many of you, which I guess just goes to show you were never really our friends.
3. We won't be voting for Trump, but have fun with that talking point.
4. We may not be voting for Hillary -- deal with it. If that means we were "never Democrats anyway", so be it (just ignore all our previous votes for Obama, Kerry, Gore, Clinton, et al.)
4. Oh, and Bernie Sanders and Ralph Nader are in fact two completely different people.
5. We're not magically going to disappear, nor are the many others who showed up to Sanders' rallies, phone banked for him, put up bumper stickers and/or lawn signs, or just honked at people standing on the corner with a Bernie sign. We will grow more numerous and more powerful, and we will eventually win. (And we will do so without throwing chairs.) You are on the wrong side of history.
6. Many, many of us are African American, women, Latino, elderly, LGBT, you name it. And some of us are young white males, not that there's anything wrong with it. Oh, and some of us are young independent millennial women with our own minds who don't choose a candidate based on who young men our age are supporting. Lol.
7. We leave sadly, not gleefully or spitefully. We sincerely wish more of you had not become so blind, deluded, jaded, fearful, peer-pressured, militant, or whatever it was that could cause you to support such a flawed individual or candidate for the Democratic Party nominee for President. For you, not for us.
8. Mostly, we leave because there's no use even talking to you anymore. We know you feel the same way about us. Call it irreconcilable differences.
(If I missed anything, please add it below.)
Well...
Bye!
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=thread&address=1280208311&info=1#edits
In the June 6, 2016 post, you said you would relish Hillary's defeat to Trump. You got your wish. Yet here you are, furious because pnwmom made a comment that failed to place you at the center of the party, a year after you declared you would relish its defeat to fascism.
You are of course within your rights to remain focused on Bernie and only Bernie. The rest of us will focus on what Republicans, fascists, and their allies did in delivering the country to fascism. We will focus on the lives ripped apart by immigration raids, on the roll back of environmental regulation, withdrawal from the Paris Climate Change Agreement. We will focus on Trump and his allies' efforts to strip as many as 32 million people of basic healthcare and the tens of thousands of deaths that result. We will focus on the rise of hate crimes by white nationalists angry that people of color live and vote in this country, that they hold jobs and contribute to society. We will focus on continuing and ever increasing voter disenfranchisement directed at people of color, the elderly and the unproperited, both through the Kobash commission and those who seek to keep the poor and people of color from participating in the Democratic selection of a nominee by replacing primaries with caucuses, the system with the lowest voter turn out of all. We will focus on the attacks on freedom of speech, on science and knowledge, on the press. You remain focused on Bernie. We all have our priorities.
Oh, and a word of advice: Next time you send around private messages at JPR urging a never Hillary mass return to DU, try to leave out the caver moles. I suppose they can be hard to distinguish, given that JPR posts mirror nearly perfectly the alt right.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
339 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A lot of "experts" about Kamala Harris in midtown manhattan, all of a sudden.
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2017
#98
So.. would you say that any Democrat who supports legalization is too "fringe" to be in leadership?
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2017
#111
Until Citizens v. United is overturned, being able to fundraise will continue to be critical. n/t
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#151
We don't know and will never know how much the DT team spent, including ALL his outside sources.
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#336
Ding! Ding! Ding! The Democratic Party has been infiltrated by BOB'ers, who have an agenda...
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2017
#50
Democrats spent more than trump. There is a way if we let go of 2016 and focus on future.
snowy owl
Aug 2017
#164
Yes, you can save money if you can get a hostile foreign power to hack the election for you
Orrex
Aug 2017
#204
You say "still no evidence of Russian influence"? FFS. Go peddle Trump's lie somewhere else.
emulatorloo
Aug 2017
#227
Harris is a strong, BLACK FEMALE , so expect tremendous push back by that group.
Eliot Rosewater
Jul 2017
#35
Campaign donations are the new emails. One small donation three years later likely
bettyellen
Aug 2017
#338
Better yet the democrats will not win unless they address voter suppression and this Russia scandle
leon8822
Jul 2017
#11
Izzat what Russia wants 'em to think? How many Democratic hopefuls will they be convinced to reject?
FreepFryer
Jul 2017
#13
lol, I didn't bash any Democratic public figure, and I didn't even mention the primary
lunamagica
Aug 2017
#127
I implied that all Bernie supporters are misoginists? Where? And I used the word Democrat because
lunamagica
Aug 2017
#138
I've been noticing a lot of negatives coming out about the Dem party and liberals.
Iliyah
Jul 2017
#21
JPR, yeah that one too, but anti democratic party talking points are on one other I am thinking
Eliot Rosewater
Jul 2017
#67
I try to check this website out a couple of times a week to see that the non-democrats are doing
Gothmog
Jul 2017
#62
Senator Harris is a good democrat and the concept that anyone has issues with her is offensive
Gothmog
Jul 2017
#27
They have issues with her for one of the same reasons with Hillary. The obvious one.
Eliot Rosewater
Jul 2017
#37
Yes, some people trying to "think" and failing to do so becuase someone fed them
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#322
The term is not a gender specific thing, it refers to the behavior that both Wong
Ninsianna
Jul 2017
#109
Because Democrats on the internet will believe anything. It's divide and conquer. Don't fall for it.
Iggo
Jul 2017
#39
There is no alt-left. These alt-left bros are alt-right bros, and not to be taken seriously.
Iggo
Jul 2017
#47
The alt left will despise Kamala Harris for what she has in common with Barack Obama, and I'll leave
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2017
#57
The people who are trying to take down Kamala and Nancy Pelosi don't give a shit about "the issues".
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2017
#82
"The Young Turks Network Raises $4 Million From Former Republican Presidential Candidate"
emulatorloo
Aug 2017
#228
Well, there is the fact that right wingers are giving them money, making them
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#289
Russian disinformation to plant and grow instability everywhere in US politics?
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2017
#80
And before today who has ever heard of this person? Just suggesting that we don't have to
grantcart
Jul 2017
#103
Actually these are low life self promoters and all you are doing is fulfilling their wishes
grantcart
Aug 2017
#217
"Nomiki Konst, . . . who serves on the Democratic National Committees Unity Commission"
rogue emissary
Jul 2017
#95
So true. What right does she have to analyze the candidate and form an opinion.
snowy owl
Aug 2017
#172
I think talk of a "cabal" is perhaps much ado about little, if not nothing.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2017
#206
She is a solid progressive who is also minority and female. Those are the groups
pnwmom
Jul 2017
#105
Claiming that Bernie supporters are not the party's base is a divisive group attack
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#136
I didn't say they were fake Democrats. And I said that you yourself might be part of the base,
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#142
She very clearly said "They are the party's base -- not the Bernie people."
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#147
You don't get to broad-brush Bernie supporters and then make an exception for me.
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#152
Bernie can be an independent without all his followers being independent
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#156
I gave you the definition of "base." We know that Bernie's aim was to expand voting in the party.
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#140
Caucuses attract many people who are passionate about their choice -- but that isn't
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#158
I'm not going to let my original point be diverted into an argument about caucuses.
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#165
"I and several hundred of my friends were driven from this website by you and people like you."
betsuni
Aug 2017
#170
If party affiliation isn't important to a voter, if a voter only chooses based on policies,
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#173
And that worked out so well for us in '16, you think "Democrats" will be begging for another heaping
Tarheel_Dem
Aug 2017
#192
Thank you for exposing these people. We really are looking at 40 years
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2017
#275
These Operation Counteroffensive posts accusing everyone of TOS violations are funny.
betsuni
Aug 2017
#312
I find all the "put up or shut up" posts hilarious, given how much has been put up
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#315
I'd slink back to JPR where I'd be free to "speak as I see fit about corporate Dems and Third Way"
betsuni
Aug 2017
#316
It's the Trumpkin mentality, they keep seeing losing badly and getting their
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#318
I suppose if a woman were harassed at work, you'd say she chose to leave?
Flying Squirrel
Aug 2017
#261
Anti democratic party no good fucking ASSHOLES want to invade DU again and help
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2017
#276
Agreed, that's what these returning disruptive forces have been saying, after they
Ninsianna
Aug 2017
#319
You were certainly not disavowed... but I do see the allure in hanging from a cross
LanternWaste
Aug 2017
#211
That's because it's recycled 2016 campaign rhetoric that doesn't apply here.
stevenleser
Aug 2017
#203
This "anointed" business really gets my goat, which is of course why they do it.
betsuni
Aug 2017
#161
And look how well that turned out. But, no, they actually did not. The election was stolen.
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#224
There is already a major backlash to that vote. 2.9 million more chose Hillary, and the number
pnwmom
Aug 2017
#225
She's so right! Also: they need to change their underwear every hour, and wear it on the outside
ucrdem
Aug 2017
#236