Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Republicans panic over Trump tariffs: Last time "we lost the House and the Senate for 60 years" [View all]BumRushDaShow
(165,101 posts)30. I posted about that earlier today in another thread (with respect to the number in the Senate during FDR's 4 terms)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3432527
The below shows the number of Democrats (and doesn't even include the couple parties that caucused with them which amounted to 1 or 2 additional per Congressional session)
The below shows the number of Democrats (and doesn't even include the couple parties that caucused with them which amounted to 1 or 2 additional per Congressional session)
(snip)
If you look historically over FDR's 4 terms (his last term being abruptly impacted by his death), he had periods where the Senate had large supporting numbers of Democrats (and those who affiliated with them), and IIRC, the cloture number was actually 67 (vs the current 60). He was able to get SS through with those types of numbers.
(each of the below being the tally at the end of the particular Congressional session)
73rd (1933 - 1935) - 60/35
74th (1935 - 1937) - 72/22
75th (1937 - 1939) - 74/18 (and as high as 76)
76th (1939 - 1941) - 68/25
77th (19431- 1943) - 64/30
78th (1943 - 1945) - 56/39
If you look historically over FDR's 4 terms (his last term being abruptly impacted by his death), he had periods where the Senate had large supporting numbers of Democrats (and those who affiliated with them), and IIRC, the cloture number was actually 67 (vs the current 60). He was able to get SS through with those types of numbers.
(each of the below being the tally at the end of the particular Congressional session)
73rd (1933 - 1935) - 60/35
74th (1935 - 1937) - 72/22
75th (1937 - 1939) - 74/18 (and as high as 76)
76th (1939 - 1941) - 68/25
77th (19431- 1943) - 64/30
78th (1943 - 1945) - 56/39
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Republicans panic over Trump tariffs: Last time "we lost the House and the Senate for 60 years" [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Apr 2025
OP
2 parties is going to be the natural fallout of an electoral-college-based system. nt
Gore1FL
Apr 2025
#7
The Electoral College was set up to throw a sop to the slave owning states. Out-lived its usefulness. . .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2025
#9
That's the Canadian system. Don't stop there. Keep going with your idea
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2025
#8
The Republicans in Congress are to blame as they are to cowardly to stand up to Trump.
cstanleytech
Apr 2025
#11
Not in this day and age, with the RW servants helping them and a fickle voter demographic
ffr
Apr 2025
#12
Some voters would feel more of a connection to oval office if we had direct election for president
Gum Logger
Apr 2025
#16
Fuck the whole lot of that motherfucking hill of shit that is MAGA and the fucking scumbags that support them.
SoFlaBro
Apr 2025
#17
"What we don't want is overreach." LOL. Well, that's what you've got. In spades.
Martin68
Apr 2025
#20
I posted about that earlier today in another thread (with respect to the number in the Senate during FDR's 4 terms)
BumRushDaShow
Apr 2025
#30
"In the early and mid 30's there just wasn't the deep divide that we have now."
BumRushDaShow
Apr 2025
#44
Repugs can go down with the rest of us. You are complicit, you refuse to speak for us
vapor2
Apr 2025
#37
You need to go back another 20 years to 1933 and FDR, starting with the 73rd Congress
BumRushDaShow
Apr 2025
#43