Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(157,440 posts)

8. It seems like the ruling was very narrow

Fri Jun 13, 2025, 05:39 PM

Jun 13

indicating that they can't hold him for the nonsensical Rubio "national security risk" excuse and would need to cite something else (and he gave examples - improperly filling out green card, etc., which I expect might have some statute associated).

I think Khalil's lawyers are arguing that something as "minor" as a green card application issue, etc., has rarely resulted in such a draconian response as "detention".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NH Ethylene

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Government says it won't release Mahmoud Khalil despite judge's order [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Jun 13 OP

I guess that means no one has to follow a judge's orders. Irish_Dem Jun 13 #1

They *are* following the judges order Fiendish Thingy Jun 13 #2

In other words, theyre gonna waste as much of the courts time as they can, Volaris Jun 13 #9

The Law and order party, when it suits them. republianmushroom Jun 13 #3

Their law, their order. dchill Jun 13 #7

Correct, and as it suits them. republianmushroom Jun 13 #10

The government's attorney's should be held in contempt and thrown into jail until the government complies. cstanleytech Jun 13 #4

Correct, republianmushroom Jun 13 #11

Just updated - Judge sided with government (at same OP link now) BumRushDaShow Jun 13 #5

"He has not been charged with any crime." Pinback Jun 13 #6

It seems like the ruling was very narrow BumRushDaShow Jun 13 #8