Protests erupt calling for Trump, U.S. to stay out of war in Middle East

[BumRushDaShow]

17. There is a split in the MAGat movement - in some cases, anti-neocon as part of their attempt at "populist" rhetoric

Trump’s military attack on Iran reveals split among Maga diehards

Saturday’s US strikes on Iran provoked conflicting reactions from isolationist Republicans who support Donald Trump’s “Make America great again” (Maga) movement, catching them – like many Democrats – between supporting efforts against nuclear proliferation and opposing American intervention in foreign conflicts.

(snip)

Days earlier, amid signs of a Maga rebellion against the administration’s increasingly hawkish stance on Iran, Bannon told an audience in Washington that bitterness over the invasion and occupation of Iraq was a driving force for Trump’s first presidential victory. “One of the core tenets is no forever wars,” Bannon said. Bannon, though, said “the Maga movement will back Trump” despite its opposition to military interventions.

But there are now signs that the Maga “America first” isolationist position may be more amenable to limited airstrikes. The administration has stressed that Saturday’s raids only targeted Iran’s nuclear enrichment and not manufacturing locations, population centers or economic assets, including the oil terminal at Karg island.

The far-right influencer Charlie Kirk had warned of a Maga divide over Iran, saying “Trump voters, especially young people, supported [him] because he was the first president in my lifetime to not start a new war.”

(snip)

They are generally obedient lemmings, and subject to death threats and kompromat, so most will go along with the sudden policy shift, but there will be some who won't (which is why there are those "never-Trumpers" out there), and they will lose supporters.