Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: New York Times Responds After Zohran Mamdani Story Stirs Liberal Backlash [View all]sop
(15,380 posts)"In 2024, the Times, along with other prominent national publications, didn't publish hacked information it had acquired about Donald Trump's campaign from an alleged Iranian hacking operation."
"During last year's presidential campaign, the Times, along with other publications, were given a leaked dossier on JD Vance, then-Republican vice presidential nominee, compiled by the Trump campaign. But the paper chose not to publish its contents. That decision stood in contrast to its approach in 2016, when the Times reported on hacked campaign emails from John Podesta, who was serving as Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman at the time."
"Franklin Leonard, film/TV producer and liberal cultural commentator, wrote on X, 'So apparently the New York Times now considers hacked information as legitimately reportable. (Also this story is explicitly designed to isolate Mamdani from the Black community based on his too smart for his own good decisions as an 18 year old. And he didn't even get in.)'"
"The Tennessee Holler, a progressive news outlet, wrote on X, 'So the @nytimes tried to slime Zohran using hacked materials given to them by an admitted race scientist/eugenicist who they kept anonymous even though he is publicly known about races he checked on an application to a school he didn't get into? Pathetic. A scandal in itself.'"
Edit history
Recommendations
18 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):