Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(159,484 posts)
20. You didn't read through the rest of the article
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 05:31 PM
Jul 31

(unfortunately I am out of WaPo gifts until tomorrow) but as an example, this is there -

The buyouts have rapidly sped up the process of slashing the federal workforce at an unprecedented rate, the officials said. But critics have argued that the administration’s tactics of using buyouts and administrative leave have been wasteful because the public is paying tens of thousands of employees not to work for months.

(snip)

Democrats on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations have separately estimated that the government has spent billions of dollars paying workers who are on leave either through the voluntary departure program or because of ongoing litigation over mass firings, according to a report released Thursday. The Democrats, led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), argue that the U.S. DOGE Service’s race to slim government this spring led to mistakes and waste, estimating that the whole enterprise cost the government $21.7 billion.

In letters to agencies’ inspectors general Thursday, Democrats requested a review of the costs of DOGE cuts, including how much agencies spent paying workers who were sidelined or resigned.

Some agencies have publicly shared resignation numbers for their staffing changes, though the full scope of the buyouts has largely remained unclear until now. A Washington Post canvass of agencies and internal records counted 14 agencies that had shed more than 105,000 employees through early resignation offers. The higher figure from the Trump administration accounts for some agencies that The Post’s tally did not.

(snip)


Unless it is designated as "unpaid (administrative) leave", then "administrative leave" is "paid leave". They then include the term "buy out" with that (which apparently is applying to SOME Department/agencies but not all, which is why I mentioned about what HHS was doing). I.e., "take this $$$$" as an incentive to "stop work", go on "administrative" leave until the end of the FY, and then good bye.

Blumenthal released a report (I didn't get chance to link in the OP) here (PDF) - https://washingtonpost.com/documents/b256b202-ff01-48dc-a2d1-80b0e43fa87a.pdf

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This deferred "unemployment" UpInArms Jul 31 #1
The program was voluntary SickOfTheOnePct Jul 31 #3
I understand your point, UpInArms Jul 31 #4
Yes... SickOfTheOnePct Jul 31 #5
I'm still wondering why... SickOfTheOnePct Jul 31 #2
"I'm still wondering why...you view the DRP as a violation of the Antideficiency Act and Impoundment Act. " BumRushDaShow Jul 31 #10
I narrowed it to that... SickOfTheOnePct Jul 31 #13
You didn't read through the rest of the article BumRushDaShow Jul 31 #20
I'm not disagreeing that it's wasteful... SickOfTheOnePct Jul 31 #21
Remember that the initial "Fork in the Road" stuff was sent out BEFORE the March C.R. was passed BumRushDaShow Jul 31 #23
We'll just agree to disagree SickOfTheOnePct Jul 31 #24
I go back to the mid '80s although most of those lapses were temporary back then BumRushDaShow Jul 31 #25
Oops one quick thing... SickOfTheOnePct Jul 31 #22
It's like DOGE ... in reverse! FakeNoose Jul 31 #6
I had a friend with a push button transmission in a Dodge. If you were going forward and pushed the reverse button twodogsbarking Jul 31 #12
LOL! My mom owned one of those in the 60's. A 1958 Coronet. Bengus81 Jul 31 #15
Wasn't your mom, my friend was a guy. It was in the 60s however. twodogsbarking Jul 31 #19
Sounds like they are running that program like they run many farm subsidies Scalded Nun Jul 31 #7
Unemployment Jughead Jul 31 #8
Pretty sure... SickOfTheOnePct Jul 31 #9
Actually you can. You have to go before a judge and ague your case Bengus81 Jul 31 #16
That makes perfect sense... SickOfTheOnePct Jul 31 #17
Correction, 154,001. twodogsbarking Jul 31 #11
Does that number include Trump, Vance, and the GOP Congress? LudwigPastorius Jul 31 #14
This from the party that does nothing but vilify the unemployed. They have fucking wackjob candidates posing outside Karasu Jul 31 #18
Just waiting for this to happen... haele Jul 31 #26
I wish I was one of them Polybius Jul 31 #27
It doesn't suck SickOfTheOnePct Jul 31 #28
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The federal government is...»Reply #20