Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: The federal government is paying more than 154,000 people not to work [View all]BumRushDaShow
(159,484 posts)20. You didn't read through the rest of the article
(unfortunately I am out of WaPo gifts until tomorrow) but as an example, this is there -
The buyouts have rapidly sped up the process of slashing the federal workforce at an unprecedented rate, the officials said. But critics have argued that the administrations tactics of using buyouts and administrative leave have been wasteful because the public is paying tens of thousands of employees not to work for months.
(snip)
Democrats on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations have separately estimated that the government has spent billions of dollars paying workers who are on leave either through the voluntary departure program or because of ongoing litigation over mass firings, according to a report released Thursday. The Democrats, led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), argue that the U.S. DOGE Services race to slim government this spring led to mistakes and waste, estimating that the whole enterprise cost the government $21.7 billion.
In letters to agencies inspectors general Thursday, Democrats requested a review of the costs of DOGE cuts, including how much agencies spent paying workers who were sidelined or resigned.
Some agencies have publicly shared resignation numbers for their staffing changes, though the full scope of the buyouts has largely remained unclear until now. A Washington Post canvass of agencies and internal records counted 14 agencies that had shed more than 105,000 employees through early resignation offers. The higher figure from the Trump administration accounts for some agencies that The Posts tally did not.
(snip)
(snip)
Democrats on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations have separately estimated that the government has spent billions of dollars paying workers who are on leave either through the voluntary departure program or because of ongoing litigation over mass firings, according to a report released Thursday. The Democrats, led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), argue that the U.S. DOGE Services race to slim government this spring led to mistakes and waste, estimating that the whole enterprise cost the government $21.7 billion.
In letters to agencies inspectors general Thursday, Democrats requested a review of the costs of DOGE cuts, including how much agencies spent paying workers who were sidelined or resigned.
Some agencies have publicly shared resignation numbers for their staffing changes, though the full scope of the buyouts has largely remained unclear until now. A Washington Post canvass of agencies and internal records counted 14 agencies that had shed more than 105,000 employees through early resignation offers. The higher figure from the Trump administration accounts for some agencies that The Posts tally did not.
(snip)
Unless it is designated as "unpaid (administrative) leave", then "administrative leave" is "paid leave". They then include the term "buy out" with that (which apparently is applying to SOME Department/agencies but not all, which is why I mentioned about what HHS was doing). I.e., "take this $$$$" as an incentive to "stop work", go on "administrative" leave until the end of the FY, and then good bye.
Blumenthal released a report (I didn't get chance to link in the OP) here (PDF) - https://washingtonpost.com/documents/b256b202-ff01-48dc-a2d1-80b0e43fa87a.pdf
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
28 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

The federal government is paying more than 154,000 people not to work [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Jul 31
OP
"I'm still wondering why...you view the DRP as a violation of the Antideficiency Act and Impoundment Act. "
BumRushDaShow
Jul 31
#10
Remember that the initial "Fork in the Road" stuff was sent out BEFORE the March C.R. was passed
BumRushDaShow
Jul 31
#23
I go back to the mid '80s although most of those lapses were temporary back then
BumRushDaShow
Jul 31
#25
I had a friend with a push button transmission in a Dodge. If you were going forward and pushed the reverse button
twodogsbarking
Jul 31
#12