Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(12,218 posts)
97. Checking against private sources sounds smart, but warning: they normally vary a great deal from the BLS numbers
Sat Aug 2, 2025, 02:35 PM
Aug 2

for example private payrolls from ADP vs. BLS

The first column is the BLS private payrolls number month-over-month increases https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001?output_view=net_1mth

The second column is the ADP private payrolls month-over-month increases https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMNUSNERSA (I had to do spreadsheet work to come up with the month to month differences)

The 3rd column is the difference between the BLS and ADP numbers

The first 2 columns are month-over-month increases beginning with February 2023. In thousands.
Positive ones in the 3rd column mean that the BLS number was higher than the ADP number.
BLS ADP DIFF
250 157 93
48 -53 101
167 132 35
166 52 114
170 146 24
110 138 -28
108 119 -11
89 95 -6
117 130 -13
97 100 -3
213 95 118
73 129 -56
151 91 60
169 82 87
129 113 16
160 164 -4
66 136 -70
40 42 -2
33 180 -147
208 194 14
-1 221 -222
244 204 40
287 176 111
79 186 -107
107 84 23
114 147 -33
133 60 73
137 29 108
74 -23 97 - ADP revised from -33 to -23
83 104 -21 - The latest, for July, reported 7/30 by ADP and 8/1 by BLS


===============================================================

I'm also reminded of the wild difference between two BLS employment measures:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143505265#post17

The headline payroll job numbers (+73,000 in July) come from the Establishment Survey
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001
Monthly changes (in thousands): https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
YEAR: JAN FEB MAR etc.
2022: 225 869 471 305 241 461 696 237 227 400 297 126
2023: 444 306 85 216 227 257 148 157 158 186 141 269
2024: 119 222 246 118 193 87 88 71 240 44 261 323
2025: 111 102 120 158 19 14 73
The last 2 months (June and July) are preliminary, subject to revisions

Last 12 months: 128k/month average

# Employed in thousands (down 260,000 in July) come from the separate Household Survey, http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000
Monthly changes (in thousands): http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000?output_view=net_1mth
If one adjusts the date range from 2021 to 2025, the graph is much more meaningful because it leaves out the huge swings of 2020 that greatly enlarges the Y axis and makes what follows look like tiny almost undiscernible squiggles around the zero axis
YEAR: JAN FEB MAR etc.
2022 1016 483 608 --315 487 --284 164 477 75 --126 --177 752
2023 958 178 417 162 --178 183 204 292 --33 --231 675 --762
2024 66 --177 412 70 --331 --9 64 206 377 --346 --273 478
2025 2234 --588 201 461 --696 93 --260

Last 12 months: 157k/month average
January and February of each year are affected by changes in population controls.
A very volatile data series from month to month. I used a double minus to make the negative ones stand out a little better
This Household Survey also produces the unemployment rate and labor force participation rate among many other stats

Assuming these are all honest numbers up to now, it just shows how different surveys get different results.

So I hope that a Nobel economics prize winner can tell us, in the future, when surveys vary wildly, which part of that is manipulation, and which part is, well statistical noise and methodology differences.

This posting stimulated by "Caracas on the Potomac (Krugman)"
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220530941

From here on, I’m going to be paying a lot more attention to private surveys. And when they tell a different story from the official numbers, there will no longer be a reason to take the official data more seriously.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's only going to get worse gab13by13 Aug 1 #1
The updated article noted the reported "147,000" job increase last month was revised down and was actually "19,000" BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #3
Who would have ever thought the the Felon in the White House would put out rurallib Aug 1 #5
tRump and WH do not "put out" the BLS numbers. Revisions have been frequent for decades. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #44
You do know that tRUMP is going to drive out the neutral bean counters at the BLS? wolfie001 Aug 1 #78
He's going to try (viz. firing chief of BLS today, after I wrote). We haven't seen the business world react yet. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #79
You're always measured in your responses and very intelligent and level-headed wolfie001 Aug 1 #80
Thank you for your kind words. Mass action is in our hands. I too am hoping for a Blue Storm Surge 2026. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #81
Go Blue Go!!! nt wolfie001 Aug 1 #84
And May revised down to 14,000 jobs Johnny2X2X Aug 1 #7
Yup BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #13
No, we don't need so-and-so numbers to keep up with population growth because we don't know population growth. mathematic Aug 1 #14
It is true that nearly 1 in 5 workers in the US labor force is foreign born. The irony with the immigration wedge PatrickforB Aug 1 #28
The US does need population growth for a while to deal with and care for the retiring boomer cohort Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #45
And yet when supposed economy numbers came out, some people here argue LisaL Aug 1 #15
You do have the fact that BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #20
No "just" about it. BLS is professional and no toadies parachuted in. You have NO evidence. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #46
So, like Trump, you don't believe the new numbers? onenote Aug 2 #94
Fake news my friends - sarcasm of course chicoescuela Aug 1 #12
Totally unfair! Why is everyone turning against him! Hugin Aug 1 #27
always the victim. what a pos chicoescuela Aug 1 #40
Give it a month or so for payments to be missed... Hugin Aug 1 #26
I was thinking about this this morning. Cuts in Medicare, ACA, and food programs underpants Aug 1 #29
I think Rebl2 Aug 1 #34
The massive cuts to Medicaid now will drastically degrade the level of care for Medicare as a secondary effect. Hugin Aug 1 #36
Those cuts only kick in after the 2026 midterms, by craven design of the magabots in Congress who think they are smart.n Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #47
The cuts to the CDC, NIH, and research/medical training have already started... Hugin Aug 1 #49
Medicare is also being cut substantially NickB79 Aug 1 #77
I think you are incorrect about the "no thought for ramifications" part. niyad Aug 1 #57
hmmm Skittles Aug 2 #92
"Sorry, all our fault." - Krasnov (r-felon) & G.O.P. Doormats, Inc. BoRaGard Aug 1 #2
Finally the jobs report shows the terrible impact of Trump's policies. Wiz Imp Aug 1 #4
I wonder where are all the college and high school jobs that always occurred during the summer? LiberalArkie Aug 1 #56
As I understand it, this still does not include the shit that DOGE did rurallib Aug 1 #6
Correct. There's over 150,000 Federal workers who took the deferred resignation option. Wiz Imp Aug 1 #8
In addition to what Wiz Imp wrote BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #16
How is Krasnov fucking with the numbers? ShazzieB Aug 1 #72
you are right I was wrong rurallib Aug 1 #75
No worries! ShazzieB Aug 1 #76
We are now seeing definite signs of stagflation, as feared. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #9
This right here is bad bad as I understand it. The worst type of economic downturn Cheezoholic Aug 1 #23
Stagflation comes from supply shocks. Tariff taxes are a supply shock. Labour deportations are a supply shock. Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #25
"above the June total of 14,000" - they neglect to say that that was revised down from 147,000 Prairie Gates Aug 1 #10
Powell said on wednesday that lowered immigration was resulting in lower workforce size (growth) mathematic Aug 1 #11
That might impact/be related to the Laborforce Participation Rate BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #18
Oh absolutely, the LPR for immigrants is higher than native-born. mathematic Aug 1 #24
I put much more weight on the PRIME AGE LFPR (age 25-54) progree Aug 1 #33
Well you have a party ready to bring back "child labor" BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #37
LINKS to some BLS Data Series Numbers and Graphs - progree Aug 1 #17
Thank you again for taking the time!!! n/t Cheezoholic Aug 1 #35
YW 😊 progree Aug 1 #41
I seem to recall that Biden's#s mcar Aug 1 #19
We can check. mahatmakanejeeves Aug 1 #22
No, not really. 2021 had nearly all positive revisions. 22, 23, 24 had more negative revisions than positive mathematic Aug 1 #39
An excellent link. Discussion too. Thanks. NT mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2 #91
Monthly revisions are almost always fairly modest. When the revisions become significant, it usually Wiz Imp Aug 1 #43
Interesting observation about a possible "turning point". . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #48
By that chart, shouldn't we already be in a recession? KPN Aug 1 #60
You can't really tell that by the chart since it doesn't track monthly revisions. Wiz Imp Aug 1 #64
Wisdom of the Ancients: If circles and arrows have to be drawn on a chart for you to find... Hugin Aug 1 #21
Sorry about your jobs folks but did you hear about the new Ballroom? underpants Aug 1 #30
It'll have a big shiny disco ball and gilded corners. Hugin Aug 1 #38
Trump's tariffs, anti-immigration agenda and disrespect to other nations will break the American economy. Doodley Aug 1 #31
Likely Rebl2 Aug 1 #32
Long story short FakeNoose Aug 1 #42
Great gif! 🤣 ShazzieB Aug 1 #70
Ughh, look at the headlines at finance.yahoo.com. And S&P 500 down 1.6% 1136 AM ET progree Aug 1 #50
Maddow Blog-U.S. job growth turns cold as Trump's agenda takes its toll on the economy LetMyPeopleVote Aug 1 #51
Remember ADP reported much less jobs. FormerOstrich Aug 1 #52
ADP is only counting "private sector" jobs (using their payroll subscribers as the survey source) BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #61
Not in July. ADP reported 104,000 private sector jobs on Wednesday progree Aug 1 #67
'Brutal' job report leaves experts reeling: 'Hard to overstate how bad' LetMyPeopleVote Aug 1 #53
He'll blame Biden Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 1 #54
6 Of Last 7 Months Job Growth Has Failed To Keep Up With Population Growth DallasNE Aug 1 #55
Our new Golden Age speak easy Aug 1 #58
KA-BLAM! BlueWavePsych Aug 1 #59
No worries. Turbineguy Aug 1 #62
See #63 just below you /nt progree Aug 1 #65
President Trump says he will fire BLS commissioner after July jobs report disappoints progree Aug 1 #63
"Seems like LBN OP material" BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #66
Yeah, I figured. As soon as I saw my yellow "My Posts" light lit up, I immediately thought, ruh roh, progree Aug 1 #68
CNBC's breaking banner BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #69
Not only do they do these "First Friday" job numbers, they do CPI and PPI (wholesale) inflation, Productivity, progree Aug 1 #71
Kugler resignation posted about 15 minutes before your post BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #73
"Kugler resignated posted about 15 minutes before your post" - yeah I figured that, but thought progree Aug 1 #74
When using a " and a ( or ) BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #83
Thanks :) Yes, I run into that all the time, and do the same thing usually -- stick in a space progree Aug 1 #85
I know the feeling BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #87
I wish they'd give us a choice about using AI, but no, every time I do a Google search progree Aug 2 #89
I now frequently switch to Bing (M$'s search) BumRushDaShow Aug 2 #90
Yes, it would be nice not to have AI fill up half the first page. Mostly what I'm trying to do is prevent the AI search progree Aug 2 #96
Not Surprised OhioTim Aug 1 #82
Absolutely dismal and expected. kyburbonkid Aug 1 #86
Biggest Job Revisions Since 2020 Expose Pitfall of Economic Data progree Aug 2 #88
U.S. Is Trimming Back Its Collection of Consumer Price Data mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2 #93
Kick orangecrush Aug 2 #95
Checking against private sources sounds smart, but warning: they normally vary a great deal from the BLS numbers progree Aug 2 #97
The black unemployment rate (7.2%) is the worst since the pandemic-era October 2021 progree Aug 3 #98
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. added just 73,000 jo...»Reply #97