Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Duffy to announce nuclear reactor on the moon [View all]Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
134 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Oddly enough, this could actually be one of the rare "good ideas" pursued by the F47 regime
0rganism
Aug 4
#19
Truly awful, yes, but still preferable to trying to establish a half-assed Mars colony without running a moon base first
0rganism
Aug 4
#41
If it's too small to be seen with the naked eye, it'll be called a "micro"-penal colony
0rganism
Tuesday
#76
They would need alternative cooling strategies, as dark-side temps run around -130'C and sunlit-side +120'C
0rganism
Tuesday
#123
Such devices would be there to power a future base, refining local resources, research, etc.
Gore1FL
Aug 4
#56
Here's an idea, Duffy - put pressure on Musk to sort out his "Spaceship" vehicle
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 4
#13
Planning for a reactor on the moon dates back at least to the Obama administration
onenote
Aug 4
#16
...But we can't have universal health care. I can't wrap my fucking head around this idiocy.
Karasu
Aug 4
#22
Oh, geez. There's obviously plenty I left out, or I'd be here all day, but I really don't know how I missed THAT one.
Karasu
Aug 4
#39
I'm shocked nobody has floated the idea on how to project the AT&T or Amazon logo on the moon surface...
EarthFirst
Aug 4
#23
shithole and comrades cut NASA monies and staff and are pissed off at musk...................
Lovie777
Aug 4
#36
If he wants to privately fund it then he can do it. No since wasting tax payers money to go to bunch of rocks. n/t
Jacson6
Tuesday
#102
Well, if we cancel the multi-trillion dollar tax cut for billionaires, that *might* pay for it...
Jack Valentino
Aug 4
#61
There is probably no one on this board as pronuclear energy as I am. This said...
NNadir
Tuesday
#87
Let's see. hazard pay and shipping and logicstics, OK 40 trillion sir, please click here to finalize your order.
Brainfodder
Tuesday
#98
That's one of the most idiotic ideas I've heard in a long time. What are you going to use to cool the reactor?
patphil
Tuesday
#127
Surely Duffy is afraid of the moon if he is afraid of riding the subway.
travelingthrulife
Thursday
#132