Latest Breaking News

reACTIONary

(6,639 posts)

121. You may be right. I sort of dismissed the idea without much thought.

Reply to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #85)

Tue Aug 5, 2025, 04:11 PM

Aug 5

There are craters on the moon with areas that are perpetually in shade, and even may harbor water ice. So if you place it properly you may be able to have a cold zone day or night.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

134 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Duffy to announce nuclear reactor on the moon [View all] demmiblue Aug 4 OP

Somebody didn't see Space 1999. Intractable Aug 4 #1

I love that series! markodochartaigh Aug 4 #7

With Space 1999, there's much to "whine" about while eating the cheese. Intractable Aug 4 #15

Cool show! Brings back good memories. :) Dave Bowman Aug 4 #9

I came here to post this very item IbogaProject Aug 4 #12

First thing I thought of Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 5 #89

OMFG montanacowboy Aug 4 #2

I can't even understand why this would be a goal of anyone genxlib Aug 4 #3

Oddly enough, this could actually be one of the rare "good ideas" pursued by the F47 regime 0rganism Aug 4 #19

instead of the man in the moon ... DBoon Aug 4 #32

Truly awful, yes, but still preferable to trying to establish a half-assed Mars colony without running a moon base first 0rganism Aug 4 #41

Um lonely bird Aug 4 #42

The scary thing is, I think THEY think they are MadameButterfly Aug 5 #78

Or a penal colony on. the moon? flamingdem Aug 4 #68

If it's too small to be seen with the naked eye, it'll be called a "micro"-penal colony 0rganism Aug 5 #76

That would be micro-penile RainCaster Aug 5 #80

With cooling towers and massive amounts of water? Martin Eden Aug 5 #95

They would need alternative cooling strategies, as dark-side temps run around -130'C and sunlit-side +120'C 0rganism Aug 5 #123

It's a huge investment, so careful planning & purpose are essential Martin Eden Aug 5 #124

"What possible use would energy on the moon be" PSPS Aug 4 #24

Such devices would be there to power a future base, refining local resources, research, etc. Gore1FL Aug 4 #56

Maybe a really, really long extension cord Seinan Sensei Aug 5 #73

It could power Trump's ego DBoon Aug 5 #103

advertising billboard lapfog_1 Aug 4 #38

Just another distraction from Epstein. MacKasey Aug 4 #4

🥱😴 ... & ... 😜🤣😂🤣😜🤣😂🤣😜😜 Oopsie Daisy Aug 4 #5

Yes BigMin28 Aug 4 #6

What's the point? How stupid. Srkdqltr Aug 4 #8

I'm all for space exploration but this is dumb. Dave Bowman Aug 4 #10

Well okay BumRushDaShow Aug 4 #11

Here's an idea, Duffy - put pressure on Musk to sort out his "Spaceship" vehicle muriel_volestrangler Aug 4 #13

I'm more in favor of a safe airline industry and FAA safety. Norrrm Aug 4 #14

Planning for a reactor on the moon dates back at least to the Obama administration onenote Aug 4 #16

fuel Nasruddin Aug 4 #17

I'm shocked that the source isn't the Onion. greatauntoftriplets Aug 4 #18

Or the Simpsons GreenWave Aug 4 #27

I kept looking for Onion or Borrowitz MadameButterfly Aug 5 #81

Maybe we should fix our planet first. chowder66 Aug 4 #20

Bah, no profit or glamour in that! OldBaldy1701E Aug 5 #96

Um, why? Mz Pip Aug 4 #21

It's the planned... littlemissmartypants Aug 4 #54

To make RICH men RICHER with ZERO results Bengus81 Aug 5 #94

...But we can't have universal health care. I can't wrap my fucking head around this idiocy. Karasu Aug 4 #22

And you left out 900 million to refurb the Qatari luxury jetliner. yellow dahlia Aug 4 #34

Oh, geez. There's obviously plenty I left out, or I'd be here all day, but I really don't know how I missed THAT one. Karasu Aug 4 #39

I'm shocked nobody has floated the idea on how to project the AT&T or Amazon logo on the moon surface... EarthFirst Aug 4 #23

Why not Windmills? thought crime Aug 4 #25

Such an evil thing to say... hunter Aug 4 #63

Duffy is an idiot! BidenRocks Aug 4 #26

Not duffeys's plan RoseTrellis Aug 5 #99

No money for healthcare, education, science, social security, medicare. Irish_Dem Aug 4 #28

What could go wrong? yellow dahlia Aug 4 #31

Right, what happens if the idiots blow up the moon? Irish_Dem Aug 4 #33

That's what I said - Moon? Who needs a moon? yellow dahlia Aug 4 #37

What could go wrong with one of Musk's rockets carrying nukes. Irish_Dem Aug 4 #40

I had to look twice to make sure it wasn't The Onion DBoon Aug 4 #29

Me too! WestMichRad Aug 4 #48

I just turned to Mr. Dahlia and said: What's wrong with these people? yellow dahlia Aug 4 #30

The project is set to start in two weeks. sop Aug 4 #35

You have got to be fucking kidding me. Karasu Aug 4 #66

Yes, I am kidding. sop Aug 4 #67

I can't believe I didn't pick up on that! LOL!!! Karasu Aug 5 #74

shithole and comrades cut NASA monies and staff and are pissed off at musk................... Lovie777 Aug 4 #36

Trump needs to . . . AverageOldGuy Aug 4 #43

How much fissionable material would be needed. The Madcap Aug 4 #44

That was my first thought as well. thucythucy Aug 5 #105

At least it would be taking off from TX or FL. The Madcap Aug 5 #113

Why would put a reactor on the most Aviation Pro Aug 4 #45

It required lots of power to extract Helium 3 Abnredleg Aug 5 #110

Shot over Aviation Pro Aug 5 #114

Shot out!! Abnredleg Aug 5 #115

SQUIRREL!!! maspaha Aug 4 #46

So let me see if I understand angrychair Aug 4 #47

Your assessment is exactly correct. llmart Aug 4 #60

I can understand how a moon reactor can produce heat.... reACTIONary Aug 4 #49

NNadir is really our DU expert in this area. ... littlemissmartypants Aug 4 #57

I don't think a steam turbine would be a problem in principle muriel_volestrangler Aug 5 #85

You may be right. I sort of dismissed the idea without much thought. reACTIONary Aug 5 #121

Um ok, why not solar? BWdem4life Aug 4 #50

I had the same question C_U_L8R Aug 4 #51

There are a lot of impact sites ... littlemissmartypants Aug 4 #58

Night time on the moon lasts about 14 days. hunter Aug 4 #64

Thanks. I knew it got dark, but I don't know for how long. reACTIONary Aug 4 #70

Solar is defiantly in the plan - plus there is a nation state issue... reACTIONary Aug 4 #69

declare away. put a reactor on the moon and MadameButterfly Aug 5 #83

It does seem that an "exclusion zone" would be hard to enforce.... reACTIONary Aug 5 #120

a nuclear reactor on the moon MadameButterfly Wednesday #128

A moon nuke... reACTIONary Wednesday #129

You think they could monitor a reactor on the moon MadameButterfly Thursday #130

Yep... They sure can! reACTIONary Thursday #131

Sorry if I'm missing the point MadameButterfly Friday #133

You asked if I think.... reACTIONary Friday #134

too woke. But yeah, duh MadameButterfly Aug 5 #82

I thought reactors require cooling water The Blue Flower Aug 4 #52

Air cooled reactors have been around since the 1960's Abnredleg Aug 5 #111

"Air cooling" is not exactly a lunar option, with no air muriel_volestrangler Aug 5 #119

It was great for mankind to go to the moon 56 years ago. Jacson6 Aug 4 #53

Elon... littlemissmartypants Aug 4 #59

If he wants to privately fund it then he can do it. No since wasting tax payers money to go to bunch of rocks. n/t Jacson6 Aug 5 #102

(!) Marcuse Aug 4 #55

Well, if we cancel the multi-trillion dollar tax cut for billionaires, that *might* pay for it... Jack Valentino Aug 4 #61

Translation: We intend to drain a lot of money into our pockets, but good luck mahina Aug 4 #62

I don't see anything wrong with the basic premise. hunter Aug 4 #65

Yes. Location, Location, Location. reACTIONary Aug 4 #71

Who VOTED for that? nt SouthBayDem Aug 4 #72

There's very little gravity on the moon , right? Figarosmom Aug 5 #75

Just send the building materials to the moon on trucks. Botany Aug 5 #97

This plus a dome covering the entire country? IcyPeas Aug 5 #77

This is not simple. And it is terrifying. colorado_ufo Aug 5 #79

Old project initiated in November, 2021. RoseTrellis Aug 5 #84

Actually a continuation of efforts that began in 2015 onenote Aug 5 #88

Wow RoseTrellis Aug 5 #91

A bad idea is a bad idea thucythucy Aug 5 #112

We aren't even a year in JustAnotherGen Aug 5 #86

There is probably no one on this board as pronuclear energy as I am. This said... NNadir Aug 5 #87

Hi NNadir, I'm always glad to see you here. thucythucy Aug 5 #117

The MF wanted to blow the moon up. I remember. Here we go. twodogsbarking Aug 5 #90

Gonna need a real long extension cord Conjuay Aug 5 #92

Maybe build the Ballroom 3825-87867 Aug 5 #93

Let's see. hazard pay and shipping and logicstics, OK 40 trillion sir, please click here to finalize your order. Brainfodder Aug 5 #98

Please, lets get him a one way ticket. milestogo Aug 5 #100

Kick. I duped you. underpants Aug 5 #101

Gil Scott Heron anticipated this long ago DBoon Aug 5 #104

How about announcing improvements to the Air Traffic Control system. Sneederbunk Aug 5 #106

Republican announces daycare center on Mars. ananda Aug 5 #107

Just sayin' Docreed2003 Aug 5 #108

This is part of Project Artemis Abnredleg Aug 5 #109

Long term it's a good idea NickB79 Aug 5 #116

I have the most idiotic, stupid, brain-dead government in history. Torchlight Aug 5 #118

Duffy has entered the "How stupid can you get?" contest Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 5 #122

Even if this were feasible mysuzuki2 Aug 5 #125

That ought to lower grocery prices and utility bills for Americans dalton99a Aug 5 #126

That's one of the most idiotic ideas I've heard in a long time. What are you going to use to cool the reactor? patphil Aug 5 #127

Surely Duffy is afraid of the moon if he is afraid of riding the subway. travelingthrulife Thursday #132