Latest Breaking News

kyburbonkid

(263 posts)

27. Yeap. Bout half.

Fri Sep 12, 2025, 02:18 AM

Sep 2025

Yes sir, about half. And with the trog we have as president (and republican party) so destructive to our Union, that even simple science funding is under pressure. But yes; "Other statutory provisions also require the Foundation to support underrepresented groups in STEM fields" ... that says it all IMHO.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge allows Trump to cut more than $1bn in National Science Foundation grants [View all] BumRushDaShow Sep 2025 OP

So much for the courts orangecrush Sep 2025 #1

I imagine Trump and Republicans are very proud of this disaster! riversedge Sep 2025 #2

The Stated Reason Is Vacuous ProfessorGAC Sep 2025 #3

Yeah that seems pretty suss AZJonnie Sep 2025 #6

Did you read the opinion? onenote Sep 2025 #21

No. ProfessorGAC Sep 2025 #35

This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Sep 2025 #36

The article was accurate and not "horribly misleading" onenote Sep 2025 #37

Wrong ProfessorGAC Sep 2025 #38

This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Sep 2025 #39

Wow. You're so convincing. Not onenote Sep 2025 #40

Do judges hate Americans or is Trump giving them a cut of the crime profits? Irish_Dem Sep 2025 #4

Good question. And what really sucks is that this was a Biden appointee AZJonnie Sep 2025 #7

Maybe some of them are on the Epstein list. Irish_Dem Sep 2025 #8

I think you're well-versed on my general opinion re: this topic by now AZJonnie Sep 2025 #9

We simply do not know how far and wide the Putin/Trump tentacles reach. Irish_Dem Sep 2025 #15

Lets just say I'm a lot more inclined to believe in the corrupting power of the TrumPutin tentacles AZJonnie Sep 2025 #19

Honey there are all the exact same tentacles. Irish_Dem Sep 2025 #28

Or maybe she just happens to think it's in his constitutional boundaries to do so, even if she happens to disagree Polybius Sep 2025 #14

Funny how the constitutional boundaries are mostly in the Trump Crime Syndicate's favor. Irish_Dem Sep 2025 #17

what about "no backsies" ??? nt orleans Sep 2025 #18

Do you know if there is any further news on the administrative fee cap (from your related article)? AZJonnie Sep 2025 #5

When I was looking for any threads associated with the OP's case (which I couldn't find - it was filed in D.C.) BumRushDaShow Sep 2025 #11

Fair enough. But if the regime wins on the 15% cap case as well, I think we'd be looking at a HUGE hit to funding AZJonnie Sep 2025 #13

Whoops! They forgot to name the District Court Judge ... Jia M. Cobb FakeNoose Sep 2025 #10

The grant money needs more time to process through Trump's accounts. miyazaki Sep 2025 #12

great! now this whole damn country can be as STUPID AS THAT FUCKING JUDGE! nt orleans Sep 2025 #16

Not sure I'd call this particular judge stupid AZJonnie Sep 2025 #20

My guess is that most if not all of the posts slagging this judge haven't read the decision. onenote Sep 2025 #22

Less Money For Science, More Money For Clarence Thomas DrFunkenstein Sep 2025 #23

So much for breach of contract iemanja Sep 2025 #24

Yes, but you have to go to the right court. onenote Sep 2025 #31

Antiscience goons at play kyburbonkid Sep 2025 #25

"Did you read the opinion?" J_William_Ryan Sep 2025 #26

Yeap. Bout half. kyburbonkid Sep 2025 #27

How far do I have to dig Conjuay Sep 2025 #29

FakeNoose posted upthread BumRushDaShow Sep 2025 #32

Make cancer great again. Vinca Sep 2025 #30

Read one note's... GiqueCee Sep 2025 #33

Project 2025 dumbing down America for the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 Sep 2025 #34