Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Jimmy Kimmel has a strong First Amendment claim against Trump's FCC [View all]SunSeeker
(57,354 posts)26. I respect Tribe. Tribe hasn't said Kimmel has a weak case.
I don't know your friend, and you won't name him.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jimmy Kimmel has a strong First Amendment claim against Trump's FCC [View all]
bunny planet
Sep 18
OP
Tell me what you see in this dispute and your knowledge of entertainment contracts that
hlthe2b
Sep 18
#4
Maybe... but Neil and I discussed that a bit and he thought it wouldn't work without ABC
hlthe2b
Sep 18
#10
It was explained elsewhere that the ABC parasitic Sinclair Group declared war on ABC.
GreenWave
Sep 18
#42
Well, had they not folded, ABC would have had a strong case, but Kimmel? I don't think so...
hlthe2b
Sep 18
#2
Kimmel's claim, as the OP states, is against the FCC. And THAT is a strong case.
SunSeeker
Sep 18
#17
I addressed this earlier and why my Legal Professor friend in Contracts Law (and I) feel that
hlthe2b
Sep 18
#18
My friend is as respected in contracts and constitutional law as is Tribe, but be nasty to me as you wish
hlthe2b
Sep 18
#25
I would never name someone whose doxxing could put them at risk. Would you do that to your
hlthe2b
Sep 18
#29
I agree with you, the constitutional issues are paramount here, not contacts law.
SunSeeker
Sep 18
#37
SCOTUS: First Amendment doesn't apply to mean comments about patriots like Charlie Kirk!
50 Shades Of Blue
Sep 18
#3
Right. So, Kimmel has every right to say what he wants, but ABC (sadly) does not have to
hlthe2b
Sep 18
#7
Wrong. It matters why ABC won't air him. ABC execs canned him because they feared Trump retribution.
SunSeeker
Sep 18
#14
I discuss tortuous interference with a contract upstream in my original posts as well
hlthe2b
Sep 18
#15
Only if it goes to court and only if all of the people involved truthfully testify.
progressoid
Sep 18
#19
No, it is even MORE clear cut. ABC not standing up proves they fear Carr's threats.
SunSeeker
Sep 18
#21
As I said, I debated this intensely with a 30 year contracts law legal professor this morning
hlthe2b
Sep 18
#24
You might want to cite the author of this quote, rather than Daily Kos --- Sabrina Haake
erronis
Sep 18
#6
Not airing him still costs Kimmel in marketability, plus they won't pay forever.
SunSeeker
Sep 18
#16
I wonder if his contract allows him to be on other comedians' shows. I've seen him on Fallon, so it might.
ancianita
Sep 18
#28