Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

stopdiggin

(14,623 posts)

1. that doesn't sound 'problematic' .. that sounds unequivical

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Wed Oct 8, 2025, 12:06 PM

Oct 8

leading one to believe that there must be other aspects .. ? Other points and charges that they still believe they can proceed on?
Or - - that there is other evidence (emails, records?) that directly disprove and refute the professors testimony?

But, other than that ... That ain't 'problematic', son. That's your witness callin' you a liar!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Grey5

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Central witness undermines case against James Comey, prosecutors concluded: Sources [View all] BumRushDaShow Oct 8 OP

that doesn't sound 'problematic' .. that sounds unequivical stopdiggin Oct 8 #1

Probably not. Happy Hoosier Oct 8 #3

From the article- rzemanfl Oct 8 #2

I keep flashing back to Dustin Hoffman's character Buddyzbuddy Oct 8 #4