Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

slightlv

(6,957 posts)
16. I like the lock-up and deport aspect of your reply! Until we start stripping these
Wed Oct 15, 2025, 12:20 AM
Oct 15

people of their citizenship and deporting them to other countries... say, El Salvador or someplace in Africa (if given my choice) we're never going to be rid of them.

Once we get our government back under true democratic rule, we have to rule the republican, conservative, and Maga parties as being terrorist organizations and back up the statement with the explanations of what that entails. As well, those indicted and convicted of treason have to pay the ultimate price they've always had to pay -- capital punishment. Our "laws" have always been handed down with an iron fist on those who can't afford top line lawyers or who don't have friends in high places. We have to change that such that a disproportionate number of those "well to do" end up paying from current and past crimes in higher numbers. Eventually the pendulum can swing back to the middle, where the law is the law no matter who you are. Perhaps lawyers can only be paid what the average person can pay a lawyer, and no more - not in money or in bribes with other material assets. We have to have a way to level out the field for everyone. Obviously, the more money you pay for the higher ranked lawyer, the less likely you are to pay for your crimes, as the world goes now. That has to change. I look forward to the pendulum swinging!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge furious as he rules...»Reply #16