Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(40,105 posts)
6. More than fifty years ago sending people to the moon was a grand adventure...
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 11:35 AM
Oct 21

... that pushed the limits of our technology.

Now it's just a dangerous stunt.

My grandfather was an engineer for the Apollo Project. Various bits of the metal that took men to the moon and back were his. He was immensely proud of that work -- complex problems solved not with computers but with slide rules, chalk boards, and sketches on paper; drawings made on drafting tables, respecting and working shoulder-to-shoulder with the talented machinist and technicians who fabricated the metal, and an unwavering commitment to quality.

We now know much more about the moon than we did then. Our robots can accomplish more science in space than any human burdened by complex and expensive life support systems can.

What's the point of sending humans too the moon?

I doubt natural born humans will ever have a significant presence in space beyond low earth orbit. We're just too damned fragile and space is too damned dangerous.

Of course people still climb Mount Everest too and many die doing it. I just don't want to encourage them, and I certainly don't want to subsidize them.

No good will come of this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

just another chapter in the orange asshole vs empty husk grudge match. nt Javaman Oct 21 #1
even a blind squirrel finds the occasional nut Eugene Oct 21 #5
Imagine how much progress we could make on Earth by redirecting these billions here. Lonestarblue Oct 21 #2
Unfortunately we have too many dreamers. The Grand Illuminist Oct 21 #4
The SpaceX lunar plans are too complicated LastDemocratInSC Oct 21 #3
More than fifty years ago sending people to the moon was a grand adventure... hunter Oct 21 #6
I think it is supposed to be a reintroduction to off-world exploration BumRushDaShow Oct 21 #7
Why would any rational human want to go to Mars? hunter Oct 21 #8
You must not be a Trekkie like me! BumRushDaShow Oct 21 #9
I've been a Star Trek fan since the first episode aired and a Science Fiction fan longer than that. hunter Oct 21 #12
Well then you would know the "reason" BumRushDaShow Oct 21 #15
Baby smiles. hunter Oct 21 #16
That was the ongoing debate within Trek BumRushDaShow Oct 21 #18
Species survival RoseTrellis Oct 21 #13
If we survive for any great time as a species (most species don't) it won't be because we built rockets. hunter Oct 21 #17
Here is a novel idea angrychair Oct 21 #10
NASA still contracted that out BumRushDaShow Oct 21 #11
Not like it used to be angrychair Oct 21 #19
What's different BumRushDaShow Wednesday #20
I get that angrychair Wednesday #21
We have a lack of effective oversight BumRushDaShow Wednesday #22
Absolutely agree angrychair Wednesday #23
Musk's Starship Lander has never looked like a good idea. LudwigPastorius Oct 21 #14
Nothing that asshole does angrychair Wednesday #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NASA opens SpaceX's moon ...»Reply #6